Sectionable terraces and the (generalised) Oberwolfach problem (Q1810660)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Sectionable terraces and the (generalised) Oberwolfach problem
scientific article

    Statements

    Sectionable terraces and the (generalised) Oberwolfach problem (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    9 June 2003
    0 references
    In 1892 Lucas posed (and solved, giving credit to Walecki) the round-dance problem of arranging an odd number \(v\) of children to dance in \((v-1)/2\) successive rings, each of size \(v\), in such a way that each child has every other child as a neighbor exactly once. The Oberwolfach problem, due to Ringel, requires an odd number \(v\) of people to dine at a set of round tables of individual capacity at least 3 and total capacity \(v\) for \((v-1)/2\) successive meals in such a way that each person has every other person as a neighbor exactly once. Both problems are equivalent to decomposing the complete graph \(K_v\) on the vertices into mutually isomorphic 2-factors---the round-dance problem requires that the 2-factors are Hamiltonian cycles, whereas in the Oberwolfach problem each 2-factor must be a union of cycles where the sum of the lengths of the cycles is \(v\). In the literature the problem has been denoted by \(\text{OP}(l_1,\dots,l_m)\), where there are \(m\) cycles of the lengths \(l_1,l_2,\dots, l_m\). \textit{P. Gvozdjak} [Discrete Math. 173, 61-69 (1997; Zbl 0908.05073)] considered the more general problem of decomposing the complete multigraph \(\lambda K_{n+1}\) into mutually isomorphic 2-factors---here \(n+1\) may be even or odd provided that, if \(n+1\) is even, then so is \(\lambda\). The generalized Oberwolfach problem requires \(v\) people to sit at \(s\) round tables of sizes \(l_1,\dots, l_s\) (where \(l_1+l_2+\cdots+ l_s= v\)) for successive meals in such a way that each pair of people are neighbors exactly \(\lambda\) times. The problem has been denoted by \(\text{OP}(\lambda; l_1,l_2,\dots, l_m)\), and if \(\lambda= 1\), which turns out to be the original problem, which has been abbreviated to \(\text{OP}(l_1,l_2,\dots, l_m)\). Even though it was well known in 1892 a different terminology was used then, but that a directed terrace with a symmetric sequencing for the cycle group of order \(2n\) can be used to solve \(\text{OP}(2n+1)\). In this paper the authors showed that how terraces with special properties can be used to solve \(\text{OP}(2;l_1,l_2)\) and \(\text{OP}(l_1,l_1,l_2)\) for a wide selection of values of \(l_1\), \(l_2\) and \(v\). They also gave a new solution to \(\text{OP}(2;l,l)\) that is based on \(Z_{2l-1}\). Solutions to the problem are also of use in the design of experiments, where solutions for tables of equal size are called resolvable balanced circuit Rees neighbor designs.
    0 references
    0 references
    2-sequencing
    0 references
    terrace
    0 references
    Hamiltonian decomposition
    0 references
    Lucas-Walecki construction
    0 references
    circuit Rees neighbour design
    0 references
    round-dance neighbur design
    0 references
    symmetric sequencing
    0 references
    0 references