Flips of moduli spaces and transition formulas for Donaldson polynomial invariants of rational surfaces (Q1909682)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Flips of moduli spaces and transition formulas for Donaldson polynomial invariants of rational surfaces
scientific article

    Statements

    Flips of moduli spaces and transition formulas for Donaldson polynomial invariants of rational surfaces (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    21 May 1997
    0 references
    The paper deals with a problem which has attracted a lot of attention recently. Let \(X\) be a projective smooth complex surface, and \(\Delta\), \(c\) be a divisor on \(X\) and an integer, respectively. If \(L\) is an ample line bundle on \(X\), let \({\mathcal M}_L (\Delta,c)\) be the moduli space of (Gieseker) \(L\)-semistable rank-two torsion-free sheaves \(F\) on \(X\) with \(\text{det} F\cong {\mathcal O}_X (\Delta)\) and \(e_2(F)=c\). If \(c_1(L)\) belongs to the complement of a certain set of walls in the ample cone, one can define certain classes in the cohomology of \({\mathcal M}_L (\Delta,c)\); intersection of these classes defines a so-called Donaldson polynomial of \(X\). If \(p_g (X)>0\) these polynomials do not depend on the choice of \(L\), if \(p_g(X) =0\) they depend only on the open chamber (in the complement of the walls) containing \(c_1(L)\): If \({\mathcal C}\) denotes the chamber, let \(D^X_{\Delta,c} ({\mathcal C})\) be the corresponding polynomial. Assuming \(p_g(X) =0\), the question is: How does \(D^X_{\Delta,c} ({\mathcal C})\) vary when we change the chamber? It suffices to determine the difference \(\delta^X_{\Delta,c} ({\mathcal C}_+, {\mathcal C}_-): =D^X_{\Delta,c} ({\mathcal C}_+) - D^X_{\Delta,c} ({\mathcal C}_-)\) for chambers separated by a single wall. If \({\mathcal M}_+\), \({\mathcal M}_-\) are the corresponding moduli spaces, the authors describe how to obtain \({\mathcal M}_+\) from \({\mathcal M}_-\) by a sequence of blow-ups and blow-downs (flips); this result holds with no restriction on \(p_g(X)\). The authors analyze in greater detail the case when \(X\) is rational with \(-K_X\) effective, and they obtain formulae for some of the differences \(\delta^X_{\Delta,c} ({\mathcal C}_+, {\mathcal C}_-)\).
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    rational surfaces
    0 references
    flips
    0 references
    moduli space
    0 references
    Donaldson polynomial
    0 references
    blow ups
    0 references
    0 references