Estimating maxima of generalized cross ambiguity functions, and uncertainty principles (Q1940125)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Estimating maxima of generalized cross ambiguity functions, and uncertainty principles
scientific article

    Statements

    Estimating maxima of generalized cross ambiguity functions, and uncertainty principles (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    5 March 2013
    0 references
    Motivated by the examples of radar cross ambiguity and wideband ambiguity functions, a generalized cross ambiguity function is defined as follows. Let \(S\subset\mathbb{R}^s\) for some \(s\geq 1\), \(X\) a Hilbert space, and let \(\{U(t), t\in S\}\), be a family of unitary operators depending weakly continuously on \(t\) and such that \(U(t_0)=I\) for some specific \(t_0\in S\). The generalized cross ambiguity function mapping \(A:X\times X\to \mathcal{C}(S)\) is defined as \(A(f,g)(t)=\langle f,\, U(t)^\ast g\rangle\). As is the case of radar ambiguity, certain parameter estimation problems can be framed in terms of maximization of \(A(f,g)\) for specific \(f,g\). Given \(F\in X\) and \(g=U(t_d)F\) for some fixed \(t_d\in S\), the unitarity of \(U\) gives \(A(f,G)(t_d)=\langle f,\, F\rangle\) and the quantity \(\Re A(f,G)(t)\) has a maximum value \(\|F\|^2\) at \(t_d\). Given \(t=(t_1,\dotsc, t_s)\in S\) and \(1\leq j\leq s\), one defines possibly unbounded skew-adjoint operators \(T_j: \mathcal{D}(T_j(t))\to X\) by \(\frac{\partial}{\partial t_j}A(f,g)(t)=-\langle f, T_j(t) g\rangle\) or, with suitable constraints, \(\frac{\partial}{\partial t_j} U(t) f=U(t) T_j(t) f\) and with \(F,G\) as above, \[ \Re A\Bigl(\frac{\partial}{\partial t_j}(T_k (t_d) F),G\Bigr)(t_d)=0=\Re A\Bigl(\frac{\partial}{\partial t_j}(T_k (t_d) F),F\Bigr)=0\, . \] It is proved that optimization properties are preserved under suitably defined differentiable mappings. It is also proved that, if there exist \(F_N\) and \(G_N\) converging to \(F\) and \(G\), respectively, then the \(t_d^N\) that maximize \(A(F_N,G_N)(t_d^N)\) converge to \(t_d\) that optimizes \(A(F,G)\). It is illustrated how this approach provides a practical means of approximating \(t_d\) in the case of radar and wide-band ambiguity functions for band-limited signals. The following inequality is established. Define a matrix \(B=B(F)\) by \(B_{jk}=\Re \langle T_j(t_d) F, T_k(t_d)F\rangle\) where \(F\in\mathcal{D} (T_j(t_d))\), \(j=1,\dotsc, s\). Also let \(\lambda_j=\langle T_j,F\rangle/\|F\|^2\) and \(C\) denote the matrix \(C_{jk}=\Re \langle T_j(t_d)F-\lambda_jF,\, T_k(t_d)F-\lambda_k F\rangle\). For a positive semidefinite matrix \(M\) and \(c>0\), define \(E_M(c)=\{x\in\mathbb{R}^s: x^TMx<c\}\). It is shown that \(E_B(c)\subset E_C(c)\). As a consequence of these facts the following uncertainty inequalities are established for symmetric operators \(S_1, S_2, S_3\) on \(X\) and \(F\in \mathcal{D}(S_jS_k)\cap\mathcal{D}(S_kS_j)\) for \(j,k=1,\dotsc, 3\). Let \(\xi=(\langle [S_2,S_3] F,F\rangle,\, \langle [S_3,S_1] F,F\rangle,\, \langle [S_1,S_2] F,F\rangle)^T\). Then, for \(B,C\) as above, one has \(\det B\geq \frac{1}{4}\overline{\xi}^T B\xi\) and \(\det C\geq \frac{1}{4}\overline{\xi}^T C\xi\).
    0 references
    cross ambiguity function
    0 references
    time delay
    0 references
    Doppler shift
    0 references
    uncertainty principles
    0 references

    Identifiers