Toward Dirichlet's unit theorem on arithmetic varieties (Q1950283)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Toward Dirichlet's unit theorem on arithmetic varieties
scientific article

    Statements

    Toward Dirichlet's unit theorem on arithmetic varieties (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    10 May 2013
    0 references
    In this paper, the author proposes a ``fundamental question'' about pseudoeffective arithmetic \(\mathbb R\)-Cartier divisors. Dirichlet's unit theorem is interpreted as the one-dimensional case of this question, and the main theorems give affirmative answers in some higher-dimensional cases. More specifically, let \(X\) be a generically smooth projective arithmetic variety of dimension \(d\) (relative dimension \(d-1\) to \(\mathrm{Spec}\, \mathbb Z\)), and let \(\overline D = (D, g)\) be an arithmetic \(\mathbb R\)-divisor, i.e., \(D = \sum a_i D_i\) for \(a_i\in \mathbb R\) and \(D_i\) a divisor and \(g\) is a Green function associated to \(D\) which is invariant under complex conjugation on \(X(\mathbb C)\). A nonzero rational function \(\varphi\) on \(X\) defines the arithmetic principal divisor \(\widehat{(\varphi)} = ((\varphi), -\log |\varphi|^2)\). As usual, the cohomology is defined to be \[ \widehat H^0(X,\overline D) = \{\varphi\in \mathrm{Rat}(X)^*: \overline D + \widehat{(\varphi)} \text{ is effective}\} \cup \{0\}, \] and \(\overline D\) is big when \(\log \# \widehat H^0(X,n\overline D) \sim n^d\). The fundamental question asks whether the following two conditions are equivalent: {\parindent=6mm \begin{itemize}\item[(1)] \(\overline D\) is pseudoeffective (i.e., \(\overline D + \overline A\) is big for any big arithmetic \(\mathbb R\)-divisor \(\overline A\)) \item[(2)] \(\overline D + \widehat{(\varphi)}\) is effective (i.e., \(\geq (0,0)\)) for some \(\varphi \in \mathrm{Rat}(X)^*\otimes \mathbb R\). \end{itemize}} (2) readily implies (1), and Dirichlet's unit theorem follows from showing (1) implies (2) for \(d=1\). The key technical result of the paper is the compactness theorem (Corollary 3.3.2): if \(\overline{D_1}, \dots, \overline{D_m}\) are arithmetic \(\mathbb R\)-divisors satisfying an arithmetic-degree condition and a Chern-form condition with respect to an ample arithmetic divisor, then \(\{(a_1,\ldots, a_m)\in {\mathbb R}^m: \overline D + \sum a_i \overline{D_i} \text{ is effective}\}\) is convex and compact for any \(\overline D\). The author derives Dirichlet's unit theorem in this Arakelov-theory framework, using arithmetic Riemann-Roch theorem and the compactness theorem. For higher-dimensions, the author also needs an arithmetic \(\mathbb R\)-divisor version of the Hodge index theorem (Theorem 2.2.5); a negative-definite form over \(\mathbb Q\) might not stay negative-definite over \(\mathbb R\), so one needs to know \(\mathbb R\)-divisors for which the intersection with an ample arithmetic divisor is zero. Together with the compactness theorem, the author then proves (1) implies (2) in two cases: when \(D\) is numerically trivial on \(X_{\mathbb Q}\) (Theorem 3.5.3), and when \(\overline D\) has what the author calls multiplicative generators of approximately smallest sections (Definition 3.6.1) and \(D\) is big on the generic fiber of \(X\to \mathrm{Spec}\, \mathbb Z\) (Corollary 3.6.4).
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    Arakelov geometry
    0 references
    arithmetic divisors
    0 references
    arithmetic Hodge index theorem
    0 references
    pseudoeffective divisors
    0 references
    Dirichlet's unit theorem
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references