Constructing selections stepwise over cones of simplicial complexes (Q1985670)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Constructing selections stepwise over cones of simplicial complexes
scientific article

    Statements

    Constructing selections stepwise over cones of simplicial complexes (English)
    0 references
    7 April 2020
    0 references
    A space \(X\) is called a (finite) \(C\)-space if for any sequence \(\{\mathcal{U}_n:n<\omega\}\) of open covers of \(X\) there exists a sequence \(\{\mathcal{V}_n:n<\omega\}\) of pairwise disjoint open families in \(X\) such that each \(\mathcal{V}_n\) refines \(\mathcal{U}_n\) and \(\bigcup_{n<\omega} \mathcal{V}_n (\bigcup_{n<m}\mathcal{V}_n)\) is a cover of \(X\) (for some \(m)\). In infinite-dimension-theory \(C\)-spaces have become very important after their introduction by \textit{W. E. Haver} [Lect. Notes Math. 375, 108--113 (1974; Zbl 0287.54028)] and extension beyond compact metric spaces by \textit{D. F. Addis} and \textit{J. H. Gresham} [Fundam. Math. 101, 195--205 (1978; Zbl 0397.54051)]. The importance of these spaces lies in the nice properties like the invariance under product and cell-like mappings. The more compact variants of \(C\)-spaces are called finite \(C\)-spaces, defined by \textit{P. Borst} [Topology Appl. 154, No. 3, 665--674 (2007; Zbl 1116.54018)] and extended to normal spaces by \textit{V. Valov} [Set-Valued Anal. 10, No. 1, 37--51 (2002; Zbl 1010.54019)]. These types of \(C\)-spaces have even more nice properties, like compactification and admitting a transfinite dimension function \(\dim_C\) which is an extension of the covering dimension. The author produces additional characterizations of \(C\)-spaces and finite-\(C\)-spaces using selection and simplicial complexes. The main result is that for a paracompact space \(X\) the following conditions are equivalent: \begin{itemize} \item[(a)] \(X\) is a \(C\)-space. \item[(b)] For every space \(Y\), each aspherical sequence \(\varphi_n:X\leadsto Y,n<\omega\), of lower locally constant mappings admits a continous selection for its union \(\bigcup_{n<\omega}\varphi_n\). \item[(c)] Each sequence \(\mathcal{U}_n\), \(n<\omega\) of open covers of \(X\) admits a canonical map \(f:X\to |\Delta(\mathcal{U}_{<\omega})|\). \end{itemize} In condition (b) each mapping \(\varphi_n\) is set-valued and a selection \(g\) of \(\varphi_n\) selects one point \(g(x)\in\varphi_n(x)\). By an aspherical sequence we mean that for each \(n\) every continuous map of the \(n\)-sphere in each \(\varphi_n(x)\) can be extended to the \(n+1\)-ball in \(\varphi_{n+1}(x)\). Condition (c) works with the subcomplex \(\Delta(\mathcal{U}_{<\omega})\) consisting of those simplices \(\sigma\in N(\mathcal{U}_{<\omega})\) which have at most one vertex in each \(\mathcal{U}_n\), \(n<\omega\). A map is canonical when \(f^{-1}st\langle\alpha\rangle\subset \mathcal{U}_\alpha\) for each \(\mathcal{U}_\alpha\in \mathcal{U}_n\), \(n<\omega\) where \(st\langle\alpha\rangle\) is the relative interior of the union of simplices containing \(\alpha\). This result generalizes the result of \textit{V. V. Uspenskij} [Topology Appl. 85, No. 1--3, 351--374 (1998; Zbl 0921.54014)] that a paracompact space \(X\) is a \(C\)-space iff each space \(Y\) and each lower locally constant aspherical-valued mapping \(\Phi:X\to Y\) has a continuous selection. The paper step by step explains the relation between covers, cones of simplicial complexes and selections leading to the main auxiliary theorem that for a space \(Y\) and a paracompact space \(X\) and \(0<\mu\le\omega+1\), the following conditions are equivalent: \begin{itemize} \item[(a)] If \(\varphi_n:X\leadsto Y\), \(n<\omega\), is an aspherical sequence of lower locally constant mappings, then \(\bigcup_{n<\kappa}\varphi_n\) admits a continuous selection for some \(0<\kappa<\mu\). \item[(b)] If \(\mathcal{U}_n\), \(n<\omega\), is a sequence of open locally finite covers of \(X\), then \(|\Delta_{[\mathcal{U}_{<\kappa}]}|:X\to |\Delta(\mathcal{U}_{<\kappa})|\) has a continuous selection for some \(0<\kappa<\mu\). \end{itemize} Applying this theorem for \(\mu=\omega\) we obtain that for a paracompact space \(X\) the following conditions are equivalent: \begin{itemize} \item[(a)] \(X\) is a finite \(C\)-space. \item[(b)] For every space \(Y\), each aspherical sequence \(\varphi_k:X\leadsto Y\), \(k<\omega\), of lower locally constant mappings, there exists \(n<\omega\) such that \(\varphi_n\) has a continuous selection. \item[(c)] Each sequence \(\mathcal{U}_k\), \(k<\omega\) of open covers of \(X\) admits a canonical map \(f:X\to|\Delta(\mathcal{U}_{\le n})|\) for some \(n<\omega\). \end{itemize} The equivalence of (a) and (b) was already proven by Valov [loc. cit.]. An analogue result to characterize spaces with \(\dim\le n\) follows, where (a) \(\leftrightarrow\) (b) was already shown by Ernest Michael, cf. [\textit{V. V. Uspenskij}, loc. cit.]. The main conclusion is that again we observe that \(C\)-spaces have nice properties, which are a natural extension of the covering dimension for finite dimensional spaces.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    lower locally constant mapping
    0 references
    continuous selection
    0 references
    connectedness in finite dimension
    0 references
    \(C\)-space
    0 references
    finite \(C\)-space
    0 references
    finite-dimensional space
    0 references
    simplicial complex
    0 references
    nerve
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references