Nondeterminisic sublinear time has measure 0 in P (Q1999993)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7074487
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Nondeterminisic sublinear time has measure 0 in P
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7074487

      Statements

      Nondeterminisic sublinear time has measure 0 in P (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      27 June 2019
      0 references
      In [\textit{J. Cai} et al., ``Constant-depth circuits and the Lutz hypothesis'', in: Proceedings of the 38th symposium on foundations of computer science, FOCS 1997. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society. 595--604 (1997)] it is proved that \(\mathrm{NTIME}[n^{1/11}]\) has measure 0 in P. This implies the analogue of the measure hypothesis in P fails, because \(\mathrm{NTIME}[\log n]\) has measure 0 in P. (The measure hypothesis is a quantitative strengthening of the \(\mathrm{P}\not=\mathrm{NP}\) conjecture which asserts that NP is a non-negligible subset of EXP.) \par In the paper under review the authors improve this result by showing that the class of all languages that can be decided in nondeterministic time at most \(n(1-\frac{2\lg\lg n}{\lg n})\) has measure 0 in P. In particular, the nondeterministic sublinear time class \(\mathrm{NTIME}[o(n)]\) has measure 0 in P.
      0 references
      nondeterministic time
      0 references
      DNF width
      0 references
      resource-bounded measure
      0 references

      Identifiers