Some remarks on the weak maximizing property (Q2050897)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Some remarks on the weak maximizing property
scientific article

    Statements

    Some remarks on the weak maximizing property (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1 September 2021
    0 references
    A pair \((E,F)\) of Banach spaces is said to have the {\em weak maximizing property} (wmp) if for every bounded linear operator \(T:E \to F\), \(T\) attains its norm whenever there is a non-weakly null sequence \((x_n)\) of norm one vectors such that \(\| T(x_n)\| \to \|T\|\). The idea for this property comes from a paper by \textit{D.~Pellegrino} and \textit{E.~V. Teixeira} [Bull. Braz. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 40, No.~3, 417--431 (2009; Zbl 1205.47012)], and it was recently adapted by \textit{R.~M. Aron} et al. [Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 148, No.~2, 741--750 (2020; Zbl 1442.46007)]. The latter paper contained several open questions, a number of which are addressed here. For instance, although it was known that the pair \((\ell_p,\ell_q)\) has the wmp (\(1 < p < \infty$, $1 \leq q < \infty\)), it was unknown whether a similar property holds for \((L_p[0,1],L_q[0,1])\). The authors show that, in fact, wmp fails for \(p > 2\) or \(q < 2\). Among others, this result is a consequence of the authors' main result. Theorem. Let \(E, F, X\), and \(Y\) be non-trivial Banach spaces such that not every bounded linear operator \(E \to F\) attains its norm. Then (i) whenever \(1 \leq q < p < \infty\), the pair \((E \oplus_p X, F \oplus_q Y)\) fails the wmp, and (ii) \((E \oplus_\infty X, F)\) fails the wmp. On the other hand, \((\ell_s \oplus_p \ell_p, \ell_s \oplus_q \ell_q)\) has the wmp if and only if \(1 < p \leq s \leq q < \infty\). A number of interesting questions remain, such as: If \(E\) is a reflexive Banach space such that \((E,F)\) has the wmp for every \(F\), does it follow that \(E\) is finite dimensional? Also, the following is known: if the pair \((E, F)\) has the wmp, then an operator \(T +K\) attains its norm whenever a bounded linear operator \(T:E \to F\) and a compact operator \(K:E \to F\) satisfy \(\|T\| < \|T + K\|\). On the other hand, the authors note that the following converse is open: Let \(E\) and \(F\) be reflexive. Suppose that whenever \(T:E \to F\) (resp., \(K:E \to F\)) is a bounded (resp., compact) linear operator such that if \(\|T\| < \|T + K\|\), then necessarily \(T + K\) attains its norm. Does it follow that the pair \((E,F)\) has the wmp?
    0 references
    maximizing sequence
    0 references
    norm-attaining operators
    0 references
    weak maximizing property
    0 references
    James theorem
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references