Three types of weak pullback attractors for lattice pseudo-parabolic equations driven by locally Lipschitz noise (Q2055152)

The authors study the global well-posedness and long-time mean random dynamics for the following high-dimensional nonautonomous stochastic lattice pseudo-parabolic equation \begin{align*} & du(t) + d(Au(t)) + Au(t)dt + \beta u(t)dt = \\ & = -f(u(t))dt + g(t)dt + \sum_{k=1}^\infty (h_k(t)+\sigma_k(u(t)))dW_k(t), \end{align*} for \(t>\tau \in \mathbb{R}\), with initial data \(u(\tau)=u_\tau\in \ell^2\). Here \((W_k)_{k\in \mathbb{N}}\) denotes a sequence of independent two-sided real-valued Wiener processes with the usual conditions, \[ \ell^2 = \{u=(u_i)_{i\in \mathbb{Z}^N}\colon \sum_{i\in \mathbb{Z}^N} |u_i|^2<+\infty\}, \] \(f,\sigma_k\colon \ell^2\to \ell^2\) are locally Lipschitz continuous, \[ \int_\tau^{\tau+T} \mathbb{E}\big(\|g(t)\|^2 + \sum_{k\in \mathbb{N}}\|h_k(t)\|^2\big)dt < +\infty, \] for all \(\tau\in \mathbb{R}\) and \(T>0\), \(\beta\in \mathbb{R}\), and for \(i=(i_1,i_2,\cdots,i_N)\in \mathbb{Z}^N\) \begin{align*} & (Au)_i = -u_{(i_1-1,i_2,\ldots,i_N)} - u_{(i_1,i_2-1,\ldots,i_N)} - \cdots - u_{(i_1,i_2,\ldots,i_N-1)} \\ & + 2Nu_{(i_1,i_2,\ldots,i_N)} - u_{(i_1+1,i_2,\ldots,i_N)} -u_{(i_1,i_2+1,\ldots,i_N)} -\cdots - u_{(i_1,i_2,\ldots,i_N+1)}. \end{align*} They prove the global existence and uniqueness of solutions to this problem, define a mean random dynamical system \(\Phi\) and two universes, \(\mathfrak{D}\) and \(\mathfrak{B}\), that will be used to find absorbing sets, namely a weakly compact \(\mathfrak{D}\)-pullback absorbing set \(\mathcal{K}_\mathfrak{D}\) and a weakly compact \textit{backward} \(\mathfrak{B}\)-pullback absorbing set \(\mathcal{K}_\mathfrak{B}\). With these absorbing sets at hand, the authors find three types of weak pullback mean random attractors (WPMRA, for short): the usual WPMRA \(\mathcal{A}_\mathfrak{D}\), the backward weakly compact WPMRA \(\mathcal{A}_\mathfrak{B}\), and the backward weakly attracting WPMRA \(\mathcal{U}_\mathfrak{B}\). Furthermore, these attractors satisfy the relation \(\mathcal{A}_\mathfrak{D}=\mathcal{A}_\mathfrak{B}\subseteq \mathcal{U}_\mathfrak{B}\).