Minimal extensions of Tannakian categories in positive characteristic (Q2134024)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Minimal extensions of Tannakian categories in positive characteristic
scientific article

    Statements

    Minimal extensions of Tannakian categories in positive characteristic (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    5 May 2022
    0 references
    Let \(k\) be an algebraically closed field. A finite braided tensor category \(\mathscr{D}\) over \(k\) is \textit{non-degenerate} if the full subcategory \(\mathscr{D}'\) of the objects in \(\mathscr{D}\) that centralise every other object (with respect to the braiding) is equivalent to \(\operatorname{Vec}_k\) (via the usual functor \(\operatorname{Vec}_k \to \mathscr{D}\)). A \emph{minimal extension} of a finite Tannakian category \(\mathscr{E}\) over \(k\) is a non-degenerate finite braided tensor category \(\mathscr{D}\) over \(k\), containing \(\mathscr{E}\) as a maximal symmetric tensor subcategory. In the case when \(k\) is of characteristic zero, the minimal extensions of a given \(\mathscr{E}\) are classified in [\textit{V. Drinfeld} et al., ``Group-theoretical properties of nilpotent modular categories'', Preprint, \url{arXiv:0704.0195}; Sel. Math., New Ser. 16, No. 1, 1--119 (2010; Zbl 1201.18005)], and [\textit{T. Lan} et al., Commun. Math. Phys. 351, No. 2, 709--739 (2017; Zbl 1361.81184)], and the paper under review extends this classification to arbitrary characteristic. From now on, \(k\) is of positive characteristic. Let \(G\) be a finite group scheme over \(k\). Denote its coordinate algebra by \(\mathcal{O}(G)\), and the category of finitely generated \(\mathcal{O}(G)\)-modules by \(\operatorname{Coh}(G)\). Given a normalised 3-cocycle \(\omega\in H^3(G,\mathbb{G}_{\mathrm{m}})\), the tensor category \(\operatorname{Coh}(G,\omega)\) is given by \(\operatorname{Coh}(G)\) as its underlying abelian category, but with associativity constraint twisted by \(\omega\). It is then a fact (Lemma 2.5), that the centre \(\mathscr{Z}(\operatorname{Coh}(G,\omega))\) of \(\operatorname{Coh}(G,\omega)\) is canonically a minimal extension of \(\operatorname{Rep}(G)\). For the definition of the centre of a monoidal category, see, e.g., Definition 7.13.1 in [\textit{P. Etingof} et al., Tensor categories. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society (AMS) (2015; Zbl 1365.18001)]. The main contributions of the paper are laid out in three steps. Firstly, the author proves in Theorem 1.1 that every minimal extension of \(\mathscr{E}=\operatorname{Rep}(G)\) is obtained as \(\mathscr{Z}(\operatorname{Coh}(G,\omega))\) for some \(\omega\in H^3(G,\mathbb{G}_{\mathrm{m}})\), in the way indicated above. Secondly, it is shown in Corollary~1.2 that the construction in Theorem~1.1 induces a natural bijection. To state this correspondence, fix a non-degenerate finite braided tensor category \(\mathscr{D}\). There is a natural equivalence relation on the set of triples \((G,\omega,F)\), where \(G\) is a finite \(k\)-group scheme, \(\omega\in H^3(G,\mathbb{G}_{\mathrm{m}})\) and \(F \colon \mathscr{D} \to \mathscr{Z}(\operatorname{Coh}(G,\omega))\) is a braided tensor equivalence. Corollary 1.2 then says that the set of equivalence classes of such triples is naturally in bijection with the set of maximal symmetric tensor subcategories of \(\mathscr{D}\). Lastly, the set of equivalence classes of minimal extensions of \(\mathscr{E}\) up to equivalence naturally form a group, and the author shows in Corollary 1.3 that this group is isomorphic to \(H^3(G,\mathbb{G}_{\mathrm{m}})\). The proof of Theorem 1.1 splits roughly into two steps. First, a braided tensor category \(\mathscr{C}\) is constructed, together with a braided tensor equivalence \(F\colon \mathscr{D} \to \mathscr{Z}(\mathscr{C})\), exhibiting \(\mathscr{D}\) as the centre of this \(\mathscr{C}\). The category \(\mathscr{C}\) is defined as the \(G\)-de-equivariantisation of \(\mathscr{D}\), namely, as the category of \(\mathcal{O}(G)\)-modules in \(\mathscr{D}\). The functor \(F\) is induced by the free module functor (Corollary 3.4). The second step, is then to construct a \textit{quasi}-tensor equivalence \(\tilde{\Phi}\colon \mathscr{C} \to \operatorname{Coh}(G)\) (Corollary 3.10). The transportation of the associativity constraint from \(\mathscr{C}\) to \(\operatorname{Coh}(G)\) along \(\tilde{\Phi}\) then corresponds to the sought after element cocycle \(\omega \in H^3(G, \mathbb{G}_{\mathrm{m}})\).
    0 references
    0 references
    finite tensor categories
    0 references
    non-degenerate braided tensor categories
    0 references
    Tannakian categories
    0 references
    finite group schemes
    0 references
    restricted Lie algebras
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references