Shame and theory-of-mind predicts rule-following behavior (Q2221292)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7301447
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Shame and theory-of-mind predicts rule-following behavior
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7301447

      Statements

      Shame and theory-of-mind predicts rule-following behavior (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      26 January 2021
      0 references
      Summary: This paper examines the idea that adherence to social rules is in part driven by moral emotions and the ability to recognize the emotions of others. Moral emotions like shame and guilt produce negative feelings when social rules are transgressed. The ability to recognize and understand the emotions of others is known as affective theory of mind (ToM). ToM is necessary for people to understand how others are affected by the violations of social rules. Using a laboratory experiment, individuals participated in a rule-following task designed to capture the propensity to follow costly social rules and completed psychometric measures of guilt, shame, and ToM. The results show that individuals who feel more shame and have higher ToM are more likely to follow the rules. The results from this experiment suggest that both shame and ToM are important in understanding rule-following.
      0 references
      emotions
      0 references
      rule-following
      0 references
      social norms
      0 references
      theory-of-mind
      0 references

      Identifiers