Generic smooth representations (Q2221634)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Generic smooth representations
    scientific article

      Statements

      Generic smooth representations (English)
      0 references
      2 February 2021
      0 references
      Let \(G= \mathrm{GL}_n(F)\) where \(F\) is a nonarchimedean local field, \(K\) a maximal compact subgroup of \(G\), and \(\pi\) a smooth irreducible complex representation of \(G\). Recall that \(\pi\) is generic if \(\Hom_G(\pi, Ind_U^G(\psi))\neq 0\) where \(U\) is a maximal unipotent subgroup of \(G\) and \(\psi\) is a nondegenerate character. In other words, \(\pi\) has a Whittaker model. This article studies a criterion for the genericity of \(\pi\) based on the theory of types. More precisely, suppose that \((J, \lambda)\) is a Bushnell-Kutzko type for the Bernstein component associated to \(\pi\) with \(J\subset K\). The representation \(Ind_J^K (\lambda)\) contains a certain representation \(\sigma_{\text{min}} (\lambda)\) with multiplicity one. The author shows that \(\pi\) is generic if and only if \(\pi|_K\) contains \(\sigma_{\text{min}}(\lambda)\), in which case it occurs with multiplicity one. They also show that this is equivalent to \(\pi|_K\) containing a certain collection of subrepresentations of \(Ind_J^K(\lambda)\) which depends only on \(\pi\); we refer to Theorem 1.1. and Theorem 3.1. in the text for a precise statement. The multiplicity-one statement is obtained by realizing the relevant dimension as an appropriate Kostka number; see Lemmas 2.2. and 2.3. The equivalence with genericity is obtained by via the classification of generic representations in terms of Bernstein-Zelevinsky segments, so that much of the argument can be made combinatorially.
      0 references
      representations
      0 references
      \(p\)-adic groups
      0 references

      Identifiers