Monadic decompositions and classical Lie theory (Q2254604)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Monadic decompositions and classical Lie theory
scientific article

    Statements

    Monadic decompositions and classical Lie theory (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    5 February 2015
    0 references
    Let \(Bialg_{\mathbb{K}}\) be the category of bialgebras and \(\Omega : Bialg_{\mathbb{K}} \to Vect_{\mathbb{K}}\) be the forgetful functor. Let \(P: Bialg_{\mathbb{K}} \to Vect_{\mathbb{K}}\) be the subfunctor of \(\Omega\) that assigns to a bialgebra \(A\) its space \(PA\) of primitive elements. The paper is devoted to prove that \(P\) has a monadic decomposition of monadic length at most 2. Namely, the main result establishes: { Definition.} Fix \(N \in \mathbb{N}\). It is said that a functor \(R\) has a \textit{monadic decomposition of monadic length} \(N\) whenever there exists a sequence \((R_n)_{n \leq N}\) of functors \(R_n\) such that (1) \(R_0=R\); (2) for \(0 \leq n \leq N\), the functor \(R_n\) has a left adjoint functor \(L_n\); (3) for \(0 \leq n \leq N-1\), the functor \(R_{n+1}\) is the comparison functor induced by the adjunction \((L_n, R_n)\) with respect to its associated monad; (4) \(L_N\) is full and faithful while \(L_n\) is not full and faithful for \(0 \leq n \leq N-1\). { Theorem.} The functor \(P\) has a monadic decomposition of monadic length at most 2. Keep the notations of Definition (so, in particular, \({\mathcal B}_0 = Vect_{\mathbb{K}}, R_0 = P\), and \(L_0=T\)): (1) The functor \(L_1\) is given, for all \((V_0, \mu_0) \in {\mathcal B}_1\), by \[ L_1(V_0, \mu_0) = \frac{L_0 V_0}{\left( \text{Im} \left( \text{Id}_{R_0 L_0 V_0} - \eta_0 V_0 \circ \mu_0 \right) \right)} \] (2) The adjunction \((L_1, R_1)\) is idempotent. (3) For all \(V_2 := ((V_0, \mu_0), \mu_1) \in {\mathcal B}_2\), we have the following cases: \(\bullet\) char\((\mathbb{K}) = 0\). Then, for all \(x, y \in V_0\), we have that \(xy-yx \in R_0L_0V_0\). Define a map \([-,-]: V_0 \otimes V_0 \to V_0\), by setting \([x,y]:= \mu_0(xy-yx)\). Then \((V_0,[-,-])\) is an ordinary Lie algebra and \(L_2 V_2\) is the universal enveloping algebra \[ {\mathfrak U} V_0 := \frac{TV_0}{\left(xy-yx-[x,y] \mid x, y \in V_0 \right)} \] \(\bullet\) char\((\mathbb{K}) = p\), a prime. Then, for all \(x, y \in V_0\) we have that \(xy-yx, x^p \in R_0 L_0 V_0\). Define two maps \([-,-]: V_0 \otimes V_0 \to V_0\) and \(-^{[p]}:V_0 \to V_0\) by setting \([x,y]:= \mu_0(xy-yx)\) and \(x^{[p]}:=\mu_0(x^p)\). Then \((V_0,[-,-], -^{[p]})\) is a restricted Lie algebra and \(L_2 V_2\) is the restricted enveloping algebra \[ {\mathfrak u} V_0 := \frac{TV_0}{\left(xy-yx-[x,y], x^p-x^{[p]} \mid x, y \in V_0 \right)}. \]
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    monads
    0 references
    Lie algebras
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references