QL-implications: some properties and intersections (Q2269182)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: QL-implications: some properties and intersections |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5681812
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | QL-implications: some properties and intersections |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5681812 |
Statements
QL-implications: some properties and intersections (English)
0 references
16 March 2010
0 references
In t-norm-based fuzzy logics there are different ways to introduce implication operators. Most common is the reference to a residuation operation similar to intuitionistic logic, yielding the R-implications. A definition via reference to the classically equivalent formula \(\neg p \lor q\) yields S-implications depending upon a t-conorm and a negation function. Similarly, the QL-implications are defined via reference to the classically equivalent formula \(\neg p \lor (p\land q)\) and hence depend upon a t-norm, a t-conorm, and a negation function. The authors study this last class of implication operators. First, they discuss how properties of QL-implications depend upon properties of their defining functions. And second, they compare the class of QL-implications with the classes of the R-implications and the S-implications.
0 references
many-valued logic
0 references
fuzzy logic
0 references
t-norm
0 references
implication operations
0 references
fuzzy implications
0 references
0.8758964538574219
0 references
0.8544881343841553
0 references
0.8295695781707764
0 references
0.8280689120292664
0 references