Topology of character varieties and representations of quivers (Q2269659)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Topology of character varieties and representations of quivers
scientific article

    Statements

    Topology of character varieties and representations of quivers (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    17 March 2010
    0 references
    Let \(\mathcal{C}_{\mu}=(\mathcal{C}_1,\dots ,\mathcal{C}_k)\) be an ordered \(k\)-tuple of semi-simple conjugacy classes in \(G=\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb{C})\) where \(\mu=(\mu_1,\dots ,\mu_k)\) and \(\mu_i\) is the vector of multiplicities of the eigenvalues of any representative from \(\mathcal{C}_i\). Let \((A,B,X)\) denote \((A_1,B_1,\dots ,A_g,B_g, X_1,\dots ,X_k)\in G^{2g}\times \mathcal{C}_{\mu}\). Define \[ \mathcal{M}_{\mu}=\left\{(A,B,X)\in G^{2g}\times \mathcal{C}_{\mu}\;|\;\prod_{1\leq i\leq g}A_iB_iA^{-1}_iB^{-1}_i=\left(\prod_{1\leq i\leq k}X_i\right)^{-1}\right\}/\!\!/G, \] to be the \(\mathcal{C}_\mu\)-relative \(\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb{C})\)-character variety of a genus \(g\) surface with \(k\) punctures. In like fashion, let \(\mathcal{O}_{\mu}=(\mathcal{O}_1,\dots ,\mathcal{O}_k)\) be an ordered \(k\)-tuple of semi-simple conjugacy classes in \(\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{gl}_n(\mathbb{C})\) where \(\mu=(\mu_1,\dots ,\mu_k)\) and \(\mu_i\) is the vector of multiplicities of the eigenvalues of any representative from \(\mathcal{O}_i\). Let \((A,B,X)\) denote \((A_1,B_1,\dots ,A_g,B_g, X_1,\dots ,X_k)\in \mathfrak{g}^{2g}\times \mathcal{O}_{\mu}\). Define \[ \mathcal{Q}_{\mu}=\left\{(A,B,X)\in \mathfrak{g}^{2g}\times \mathcal{O}_{\mu}\;|\;\sum_{1\leq i\leq g}(A_iB_i-B_iA_i)=-\sum_{1\leq i\leq k}X_i\right\}/\!\!/G, \] to be the \(\mathcal{O}_\mu\)-relative \(\mathfrak{gl}_n(\mathbb{C})\)-quiver variety associated to a comet-shaped quiver with \(g\) loops at a central vertex \(v_0\) (the comet's head), and with \(k\) disjoint directed paths ending at \(v_0\) (the comet's tail); the number of vertices of the \(i^{\mathrm{th}}\) path relates to the number of components of \(\mu_i\). In both cases the algebraic action defining the quotient is simultaneous conjugation by \(G\). \textit{P. Deligne} [``Théorie de Hodge. III'', Publ. Math., Inst. Hautes Étud. Sci. 44, 5--77 (1974; Zbl 0237.14003)] showed that a complex variety \(X\) admits an increasing weight filtration \(W_0\subset\cdots\subset W_{2j}\) of its rational cohomology \(\mathrm{H}^j(X;\mathbb{Q})\), and a decreasing Hodge filtration \(F^{0}\supset\cdots\supset F^{m+1}\) of its complex cohomology \(\mathrm{H}^j(X;\mathbb{C})\) such that \[ W_l\otimes\mathbb{C}/W_{l-1}\otimes\mathbb{C}=F^p(W_l\otimes\mathbb{C}/W_{l-1}\otimes\mathbb{C})\oplus\overline{F^{l-p+1}(W_l\otimes\mathbb{C}/W_{l-1} \otimes\mathbb{C})}. \] This allows one to define the mixed Hodge numbers for every \(\mathrm{H}^j(X;\mathbb{C})\) by \[ h^{p,q;j}(X):=\mathrm{dim}_{\mathbb{C}}(F^p(W_{p+q}\otimes\mathbb{C}/W_{p+q-1}\otimes \mathbb{C})/F^{p+1}(W_{p+q}\otimes\mathbb{C}/W_{p+q-1}\otimes\mathbb{C})). \] Using relative cohomology one can define compactly supported cohomology \(\mathrm{H}^j_c(X;\mathbb{C})\), and respectively, compactly supported mixed Hodge numbers \(h^{p,q;j}_c(X)\). Subsequently define the compactly supported mixed Hodge polynomial \[ H_c(X;x,y,t)=\sum h_c^{p,q;j}(X)x^py^qt^j, \] the compactly supported Poincaré polynomial \(P_c(X;t)=H_c(X;1,1,t),\) and the \(E\)-polynomial \(E(X;x,y)=H_c(X;x,y,-1)\). In their paper ``Arithmetic harmonic analysis on character and quiver varieties'', arXiv:0810.2076v2, the authors show: 1. If \(\mathcal{C}_\mu\), respectively \(\mathcal{O}_\mu\), satisfies a genericity condition (which they explicitly define), then \(\mathcal{M}_\mu\) and respectively \(\mathcal{Q}_\mu\), if non-empty, are non-singular varieties with all irreducible components having the same dimension \({\displaystyle d_\mu=n^2(2g-2+k)-\sum_{1\leq i\leq k}\mu_i\cdot\mu_i +2}\). 2. \(E(\mathcal{M}_\mu;\sqrt{q},\sqrt{q})=q^{d_\mu/2}\mathbb{H}_\mu(1/\sqrt{q},\sqrt{q}),\) where \[ \mathbb{H}_\mu(z,w)=(z^2-1)(1-w^2)\langle \mathrm{Log}\Omega(z,w),h_\mu\rangle, \] \(h_\mu\) is a defined symmetric function, \(\langle\;,\;\rangle\) is a pairing called the \textit{extended Hall pairing}, \(\mathrm{Log}\) is the inverse to a described formal exponential, and \(\Omega(z,w)\) is a specified function called the \textit{k-point genus g Cauchy function}. 3. If all parts of the partitions \(\mu_1,\dots ,\mu_k\) are simultaneously relatively prime, then \[ P_c(\mathcal{Q}_\mu;\sqrt{q})=E(\mathcal{Q}_\mu;\sqrt{q},\sqrt{q})= q^{d_\mu/2}\mathbb{H}_\mu(0,\sqrt{q}). \] It is the purpose of this paper to announce, without proof, results expected in a sequel to the above paper. Here are some highlights: 1. The number of isomorphism classes of absolutely indecomposable comet-shaped quiver representations over a finite field \(\mathbb{F}_q\) is \(\mathbb{H}_\mu(0,\sqrt{q})\). 2. \(\mathcal{M}_\mu\) is connected, if non-empty, for generic \(\mathcal{C}_\mu\). 3. If \(g=1\) and \(\mu=(n-1,1)\), then \(\mathcal{M}_\mu\) has the same mixed Hodge polynomial as the Hilbert scheme of \(n\) points on \(\mathbb{C}^*\times \mathbb{C}^*\). Lastly, the authors discuss old and new conjectures related to these results, and geometric interpretations of both.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    character variety
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references