The new dinv is not so new (Q2325748)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The new dinv is not so new
scientific article

    Statements

    The new dinv is not so new (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    30 September 2019
    0 references
    Summary: In [\textit{A. Duane} et al., J. Algebr. Comb. 37, No. 4, 683--715 (2013; Zbl 1268.05228)] the authors introduced a new dinv statistic, denoted ndinv, on the two part case of the shuffle conjecture [\textit{J. Haglund} et al., Duke Math. J. 126, No. 2, 195--232 (2005; Zbl 1069.05077)] in order to prove a compositional refinement. Though in [\textit{A. Hicks} and \textit{Y. Kim}, J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A 120, No. 1, 64--76 (2013; Zbl 1408.05020)] a non-recursive (but algorithmic) definition of ndinv has been given, this statistic still looks a bit unnatural. In this paper we ``unveil the mystery'' around the ndinv, by showing bijectively that the ndinv actually matches the usual dinv statistic in a special case of the generalized Delta conjecture in [\textit{J. Haglund} et al., Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 370, No. 6, 4029--4057 (2018; Zbl 1383.05308)]. Moreover, we give also a non-compositional proof of the ``\textit{ehh}'' case of the shuffle conjecture (after [\textit{A. M. Garsia} et al., J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A 123, 202--238 (2014; Zbl 1281.05127)]) by bijectively proving a relation with the two part case of the Delta conjecture.
    0 references

    Identifiers