Auctioning the right to play ultimatum games and the impact on equilibrium selection (Q2351256)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Auctioning the right to play ultimatum games and the impact on equilibrium selection |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6449148
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | Auctioning the right to play ultimatum games and the impact on equilibrium selection |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6449148 |
Statements
Auctioning the right to play ultimatum games and the impact on equilibrium selection (English)
0 references
23 June 2015
0 references
Summary: We auction scarce rights to play the Proposer and Responder positions in ultimatum games. As a control treatment, we randomly allocate these rights and charge exogenous participation fees. These participation fee sequences match the auction price sequence from a session of the original treatment. With endogenous selection via auctions, we find that play converges to a session-specific Nash equilibrium, and auction prices emerge supporting this equilibrium by the principle of forward induction. With random assignment, we find play also converges to a session-specific Nash equilibrium as predicted by the principle of loss avoidance. While Nash equilibria with low offers are observed, the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium never is.
0 references
ultimatum bargaining
0 references
auction
0 references
forward induction
0 references
loss avoidance
0 references
0 references
0 references
0 references
0.7473965883255005
0 references
0.7413821816444397
0 references
0.7391806244850159
0 references
0.7277907133102417
0 references
0.7247797846794128
0 references