Criticism of trepidation models and advocacy of uniform precession in medieval Latin astronomy (Q2357600)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6730655
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Criticism of trepidation models and advocacy of uniform precession in medieval Latin astronomy
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6730655

      Statements

      Criticism of trepidation models and advocacy of uniform precession in medieval Latin astronomy (English)
      0 references
      14 June 2017
      0 references
      Medieval astronomy replaced Ptolemy's linear precession with so-called ``models of trepidation'', considered ``necessary to account for divergences between parameters and data transmitted by Ptolemy and those found by later astronomers'' (p.~211). Given that ``the phenomenon [models of trepidation] they were designed to explain was a fictitious one'' (p.~212), the subject received scant attention in the standard histories of medieval astronomy. These standard accounts portray models of trepidation as having ``dominated European astronomy from the twelfth century to the Copernican Revolution, meeting [their] demise only in the last quarter of the sixteenth century thanks to the observational work of Tycho Brahe'' (p.~211). \textit{N. M. Swerdlow} [``Tycho, Longomontanus, and Kepler on Ptolemy's solar observations and theory, precession of the equinoxes, and obliquity of the ecliptic'', in: Ptolemy in perspective: use and criticism of his work from antiquity to the nineteenth century. Dordrecht: Springer. 151--202 (2010; \url{doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2788-7_7})] has corrected this view, by showing that Tycho Brahe ``took Ptolemy's data and the existing evidence for long-term variations in the relevant parameters very seriously indeed and that his assistants Christian Longomontanus and Johannes Kepler maintained this stance in their later writings'' (p.~212). The author of the paper under review goes even further, and shows that ``Latin astronomers of the late Middle Ages expressed criticisms of trepidation models or rejected their validity in favour of linear precession'' (p.~212). The survey of these Latin medieval sources covers: (i) those preceding 1320, in which the Toledan tables and the theory of ``access and recess'' play an important role, (ii) those after 1320, in which the Alfonsine tables take the role of the Toledan tables, and combine a form of trepidation with linear precession, (iii) critical reactions to this combined model in 14th century sources, and (iv) \textit{De motu octavae spherae} (1513) by Agostino Ricci.
      0 references
      models of trepidation
      0 references
      medieval Latin astronomy
      0 references
      Ptolemy
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers