On an alleged error in Archimedes' Conoids, Prop. 1 (Q2367153)
From MaRDI portal
!
This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 232876
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | On an alleged error in Archimedes' Conoids, Prop. 1 |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 232876 |
Statements
On an alleged error in Archimedes' Conoids, Prop. 1 (English)
0 references
17 August 1993
0 references
According to Heath and Dijksterhuis, Archimedes' proof of a summation rule, as given in proposition 1 of his ``Conoids and spheroids'', is not correct. The author shows that this is not true, because a proof along the lines supplied by Heiberg was actually not part of Archimedes' text. F. Commandino has in his Latin edition of Archimedes (1558) a correct treatment by supplying the derivations which Archimedes omitted for the intermediate steps of his proof.
0 references
conoids and spheroids
0 references
proportion theory
0 references
summation rule
0 references
0.7882269620895386
0 references
0.7769660949707031
0 references
