On an alleged error in Archimedes' Conoids, Prop. 1
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2367153
According to Heath and Dijksterhuis, Archimedes' proof of a summation rule, as given in proposition 1 of his ``Conoids and spheroids, is not correct. The author shows that this is not true, because a proof along the lines supplied by Heiberg was actually not part of Archimedes' text. F. Commandino has in his Latin edition of Archimedes (1558) a correct treatment by supplying the derivations which Archimedes omitted for the intermediate steps of his proof.
Recommendations
Cites work
Cited in
(6)- Spurious theorems in Archimedes' \textit{Equilibrium of Planes}: Book I
- A lacuna in Book I of Archimedes' \textit{Sphere and Cylinder}
- In memoriam: Wilbur Richard Knorr (1945-1997): an appreciation
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 562555 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1880852 (Why is no real title available?)
- A ``lacuna in proposition 9 of archimedes' On the sphere and the cylinder, book I
This page was built for publication: On an alleged error in Archimedes' Conoids, Prop. 1
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2367153)