Betti numbers of real elliptic surfaces (Q2473584)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Betti numbers of real elliptic surfaces
scientific article

    Statements

    Betti numbers of real elliptic surfaces (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    28 February 2008
    0 references
    This article deals with real regular elliptic surfaces. An elliptic surface is a morphism \(\pi:X\to \mathbb{P}^1\) where \(X\) is a complex, compact analytic surface and such that all but a finite number of fibers \(X_t=\pi^{-1}(t)\) are nonsingular curves of genus 1. Moreover, \(X\) is said to be regular if \(H^1(X, {\mathcal O}_X)=\{0\}\). A real elliptic surface is a pair \((X, \sigma)\), where \(\sigma\) is an antiholomorphic involution of the elliptic surface \(X\) such that \(\tau\circ\pi=\pi\circ \sigma\) and \(\tau:\mathbb{P}^1\to\mathbb{P}^1\) is complex conjugation. The real part of \((X, \sigma)\) is the set \(X(\mathbb R)\) of points of \(X\) fixed by \(\sigma\). The authors prove the inequality \(\pi_0(X(\mathbb R))\leq 5\chi({\mathcal O}_X)\), where \(\pi_0(X(\mathbb R))\) is the number of connected components of the real part of a real regular elliptic surface \((X, \sigma)\) admitting a real section, and \(\chi({\mathcal O}_X)\) is its holomorphic Euler characteristic. Moreover, this bound is attained for all values of \(\chi({\mathcal O}_X)\). The proof, that is clever and well written, is not at all elementary. Among its the main ingredients it is worthwhile to mention the following. First it uses a nice result which has its own interest: Let \(\pi:X\to \mathbb{P}^1\) be a real, regular, elliptic surface relatively minimal and admitting a real section. Then, there exists a real, regular, elliptic surface \(\pi':Y\to \mathbb{P}^1\) admitting a real section such that \(\chi({\mathcal O}_X)= \chi({\mathcal O}_Y)\) and \[ h_1(Y(\mathbb R))=2\pi_0(X(\mathbb R)) \quad \text{and}\quad h_1(X(\mathbb R))=2\pi_0(Y(\mathbb R)) \] Secondly, the authors provide a proof of an unpublished result by Kharlamov that states the inequality \(h_1(X(\mathbb R))\leq h^{1,1}(X)\), where \(X\) is a real, regular, elliptic surface without multiple fibers.
    0 references
    0 references
    semialgebraic set
    0 references
    quasiregular approaching semialgebraic neighbourhood
    0 references
    tubular neighbourhood
    0 references
    retraction
    0 references
    quasiregular approaching semi-algebraic function
    0 references
    0 references