Comparison of two equivariant \(\eta\)-forms (Q2671902)
From MaRDI portal
!
This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7537695
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | Comparison of two equivariant \(\eta\)-forms |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7537695 |
Statements
Comparison of two equivariant \(\eta\)-forms (English)
0 references
3 June 2022
0 references
The fixed-point formula has two equivariant versions, the Lefschetz fixed-point formula and Kirillov-like formula of Berline-Vergne, the same is true for equivariant eta-forms. In this nice paper, authors use the analytic techniques of Bismut-Goette to define the equivariant infinitesimal Bismut-Cheeger eta-form and prove a general comparison formula between the equivariant infinitesimal Bismut-Cheeger eta-form and the equivariant Bismut-Cheeger eta-form which extend the work of Goette. In particular, they express the singularity of the equivariant eta forms modulo exact forms, at any \(g\in G\) as a locally computable differential form.
0 references
equivariant \(\eta\)-form
0 references
equivariant infinitesimal \(\eta\)-form
0 references
Kirillov formula
0 references
index theorem
0 references
0 references
0 references
0 references
0.8024729490280151
0 references
0.7734811305999756
0 references
0.7635049819946289
0 references
0.7567486763000488
0 references
0.7530359625816345
0 references