Transformations generating negative \(\beta\)-expansions (Q2855522)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6220175
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Transformations generating negative \(\beta\)-expansions
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6220175

      Statements

      25 October 2013
      0 references
      beta-expansion
      0 references
      negative base
      0 references
      piecewise linear transformation
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      Transformations generating negative \(\beta\)-expansions (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      Piecewise linear transformations of the form \(x \mapsto - \beta x - d\) generate expansions in base \(-\beta < -1\). The authors consider mainly the transformations defined by \(d = 0\) if \(x < \alpha\) and \(d = 1\) if \(x \geq \alpha\), with \(1 < \beta \leq 2\) and \(\frac{-1}{\beta(\beta^2-1)} \leq \alpha \leq \frac{1}{\beta^2-1} - \frac{1}{\beta}\). For certain parameters, the support of the unique absolutely continuous invariant measure is determined. Using Hofbauer's trick, a formula for the invariant density is given. For \(\frac{-1}{\beta(\beta+1)} < \alpha < \frac{1-\beta}{\beta(\beta+1)}\), (the restriction to the attractor of) the transformation is conjugate to the map \(-\beta x - \beta (\beta+1) \alpha \bmod 1\).NEWLINENEWLINEThe set of corresponding digit sequences is characterised in terms of expansions of \(\alpha\). The greedy expansion of a number is defined by the authors as the one that is maximal with respect to the alternating order. The set of these expansions cannot be generated by a piecewise linear transformation, but they can be described in terms of random negative \(\beta\)-expansions. Some results on unique expansions for positive bases are adapted to negative bases, but the authors fail to notice that \(x\) has a unique negative \(\beta\)-expansion (with digits \(0\) and \(1\)) if and only if \(\frac{1}{\beta^2-1} - x\) has a unique \(\beta\)-expansion.
      0 references

      Identifiers