Absolutely trianalytic tori in the generalized Kummer variety (Q291774)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6591703
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Absolutely trianalytic tori in the generalized Kummer variety
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6591703

      Statements

      Absolutely trianalytic tori in the generalized Kummer variety (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      10 June 2016
      0 references
      absolutely trianalytic subvarieties
      0 references
      hyperkähler manifolds
      0 references
      generalized Kummer variety
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      The title is misleading: the main theorem here about absolutely trianalytic tori in the generalised Kummer variety is that there aren't any.NEWLINENEWLINEA subvariety of a hyperkähler manifold \(X\) is absolutely trianalytic if it is analytic with respect to any of the complex structures on \(X\). Such a variety \(Z\) does not have to be normal but its normalisation \(\tilde Z\) is smooth and comes with a hyperkähler structure. So it has a torus factor and some irreducible symplectic factors, and this paper considers the case where only the torus factor is present. In that case, if \(X\) is the generalised Kummer variety associated with the torus \(T\), one may think of \(Z\) as embedded in the Hilbert scheme (or Douady space) \(T^{[n]}\) and compose that embedding with the map to the symmetric product \(T^{(n)}\). Pulling back to \(T^n\) one obtains a union of irreducible components each of which is a subtorus of \(T^n\). However, since trianalyticity is preserved under deformations, we may as well assume that \(T\) is general; it follows that the components are tori and, like \(T\), have Picard rank zero.NEWLINENEWLINEIt follows from this that \(Z\) does not meet the exceptional divisor of \(T^{[n]}\to T^{(n)}\), and then a computation of the volume of \(Z\) with respect to the Kähler forms gives a contradiction.
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references