Semitrivial vs. fully nontrivial ground states in cooperative cubic Schrödinger systems with \(d\geq 3\) equations (Q306563)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6621127
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Semitrivial vs. fully nontrivial ground states in cooperative cubic Schrödinger systems with \(d\geq 3\) equations
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6621127

      Statements

      Semitrivial vs. fully nontrivial ground states in cooperative cubic Schrödinger systems with \(d\geq 3\) equations (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      31 August 2016
      0 references
      cubic Schrödinger systems of cooperative type
      0 references
      gradient elliptic systems
      0 references
      ground states
      0 references
      semitrivial and fully nontrivial solutions
      0 references
      weak solutions
      0 references
      0 references
      Let \(N\in \{1,2,3\}\), \(d\in \mathbb{N}\), and for \(i,j=1,\dots,d\), with \(i\neq j\), let \(\lambda_i,\mu_i>0\) and \(b_{ij}>0\) with \(b_{ij}=b_{ji}\). The authors consider the weakly coupled Schrödinger cubic system NEWLINE\[NEWLINE\begin{aligned} & -\Delta u_i+\lambda_iu_i=\mu_i u_i^3+u_i\sum_{j\neq i}b_{ij}u_j^2, \\ & u_i\in H^1(\mathbb{R}^N,\mathbb{R}), \\ & i=1,\dots,d\end{aligned}NEWLINE\]NEWLINE and study the existence/non existence of fully nontrivial ground state solutions in dependence of the parameters \(\lambda_i,\mu_i, b_{i,j}>0\). A nonzero weak solution to \((1)\) is said fully nontrivial if all of its components are nontrivial, and semitrivial in the opposite case. A weak solution is said ground state if it minimizes the energy functional over the set of all nontrivial weak solutions.NEWLINENEWLINEFor \(b_{ij}=b>0\) and \(d\geq 3\), the authors prove that every ground state solution is fully nontrivial for sufficiently large \(b\) provided that the vector \((\lambda_1,\dots,\lambda_d)\) satisfies one of the two conditions:NEWLINENEWLINE(1) \(\lambda_1\leq \lambda_2\leq\dots\leq \lambda_d\) and NEWLINE\[NEWLINE\max_{2\leq i\leq d}\lambda_i<\alpha \min_{2\leq i\leq d}\lambda_i,NEWLINE\]NEWLINE where \(\alpha\) is a (explicitly computed) number depending on \(\lambda_2/\lambda_1,d,N\);NEWLINENEWLINE(2) \(\max_{1\leq i\leq d}\lambda_i<\frac{d-1}{d-2} \min_{1\leq i\leq d}\lambda_i\).NEWLINENEWLINEFor \(\lambda_1=\lambda_2=\dots=\lambda_d\) and \(d\geq 3\) a similar result is proved under the following assumptions:NEWLINENEWLINE(3) \(\alpha:=\min_{i}(\min_{j}b_{ij}-\mu_i)>0\) and \(\max_{1\leq i \leq d, k\neq j}|b_{ij}-b_{ik}|<\frac{\alpha}{d-2}\).NEWLINENEWLINEAs a counterpart, the cases in which every ground state solution is semitrivial or even trivial are also investigated. In this direction, the authors establish some complementary results to the above ones.
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references