Some remarks on the planar Kouchnirenko's theorem (Q365139)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Some remarks on the planar Kouchnirenko's theorem
scientific article

    Statements

    Some remarks on the planar Kouchnirenko's theorem (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    4 September 2013
    0 references
    Let \(K\) be an algebraically closed field, \(x=(x_1, \dots, x_n)\) and \(f=\sum a_\alpha X^\alpha\in K[[x]]\). The Newton polyhedron \(\Gamma_+(f)\) is the convex hull of \(\bigcup_{\alpha\in \text{Supp}(f)}(\alpha + \mathbb{R}^n_{\geq 0})\). The union of the compact faces is the Newton diagram \(\Gamma(f)\). Different notions of non-degeneracy are discussed. \(f\) is called Newton non-degenerate if for every face \(\Delta\) of \(\Gamma(f)\) the Jacobian ideal \(J(f_\Delta)\) has no zero in \((K^\ast)^n\), \(f_\Delta\) is the restriction of \(f\) to the face \(\Delta\). This condition (NND) was introduced by Kouchnirenko. \(f\) is called inner Newton non-degenerate (INND) if for all inner faces (i.e. faces not contained in any coordinate hyperplane) and for each zero \(q\) of the Jacobian ideal \(J(f_\Delta)\) the face \(\Delta\) contains no point of \(H_q:=\bigcap_{q_i=0}\{x_i=0\}\). This condition was introduced by Wall. \(f\) is called weakly non-degenerate (WNND) if for all top-dimensional faces \(\Delta\) the Tjurina ideal \(T(f_\Delta)\) has no zero in \((K^\ast)^n\), a notion introduced by Beelen-Pellikaan. The non-degeneracy conditions are specially studied for plane curve singularities, i.e. \(n=2\). A new notion of weighted homogeneous Newton non-degeneracy (WHNND) is introduced: for a maximal face \(\Delta\) write \(f_\Delta\)=monomial\(\cdot\prod_{i=1}^s (a_ix_1^{m_0}+b_ix_2^{n_0})^{r_i}\), gcd \((m_0, n_0)=1\) and \(f=f_d^w + f_{d+1}^w+\cdots\) with \(f_j^w\neq 0\) the \((n_0, m_0)\)-weighted homogeneous decomposition of \(f\). \(f\) is WHNND if for all \(1\)-dimensional faces \(\Delta\) either \(r_i=1\) for \(i=1, \dots, s\) or \((a_ix_1^{m_0}+b_ix_2^{n_0})\) does not divide \(f_{d+1}^w\). It is proved for the Milnor number \(\mu\) and the delta invariant \(\delta\) we have \(\mu=\mu_N\) resp. \(\delta=\delta_N\) if and only if \(f\) is INND resp. WHNND. Here \(\mu_N(f)=\sum(-1)^{n-k!}V_k\) with \(V_k\) being the sum of all \(k\)-dimensional volumes of \(\mathbb{R}^n_{\geq 0}\smallsetminus \Gamma_+(f)\) intersected with the \(k\)-dimensional coordinate planes. \(\delta_N(f)=V_2-\frac{1}{2} V_1+\frac{1}{2}\sum_{i=1}^kl(E_i)\) with \(E_1, \dots, E_n\) being the edges of the Newton diagram and \(l(E_i)\) the lattice length of \(E_i\) (i.e. the number of lattice points on \(E_i\), minus one).
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    Milnor number
    0 references
    delta invariant
    0 references
    Newton non-degenerate
    0 references
    inner Newton non-degenerate
    0 references
    weak Newton non-degenerate
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references