Uniqueness problems in operator representations on Fock space (Q4029007)
From MaRDI portal
!
This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 140580
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | Uniqueness problems in operator representations on Fock space |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 140580 |
Statements
28 March 1993
0 references
quantum stochastic calculus
0 references
Maassen kernel representation
0 references
uniqueness problem
0 references
0.90722644
0 references
0.88498056
0 references
0.8830472
0 references
0.88030463
0 references
0.87742126
0 references
0.87547976
0 references
0.87497056
0 references
0.87372303
0 references
0.87254256
0 references
Uniqueness problems in operator representations on Fock space (English)
0 references
[For the entire collection see Zbl 0754.00008.] In the quantum stochastic calculus, defined by Hudson and Parthasarathy, some operators admit an integral representation, that is previsible representation-like, or a Maassen kernel representation, that is chaotic expansion-like. When one operator can be represented in one of these forms, the question of the uniqueness of this representation is natural. We show that, in general, the integral representation \(T=\sum_{\rho,\sigma} \int_ 0^ \infty H_ \sigma^ \rho(s) da_ \sigma^ \rho(s)\) is not unique. We give a counter-example which has the advantage to make the origin of the uniqueness problem appear. We show that in the toy-Fock space, the natural assumption for uniqueness is the predictability of the processes. We end this part by showing that the assumption of closability on the coefficients is sufficient for uniqueness in a Fock space of any (countable) multiplicity. About Maassen kernel representations, it is shown by P. A. Meyer that, in multiplicity one, the uniqueness always arises. We extend this result to any finite multiplicity.
0 references