No label defined (Q4220137)
From MaRDI portal
!
This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1225463
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | No label defined |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1225463 |
Statements
22 November 1998
0 references
Walsh function
0 references
quasi-measure
0 references
multiplier
0 references
summability method
0 references
norm-determining manifolds
0 references
0.8123242259025574
0 references
0.7940459847450256
0 references
The aim of the paper is to find relations between several classes of multipliers, using the notions of complementary spaces and summability factors. Let \(\mathbf x\subset \mathbf s\) be a normed sequence space. The space \(\mathbf x\) is called a BK-space, if \(\mathbf x\) is complete and the coordinatewise convergence of a sequence follows from its convergence in norm. Denote \(A = (\alpha_{nk})\) a triangular matrix summability method, satisfying \[ \sup_{n,k}|\alpha_{nk}|<\infty , \qquad \lim_n \alpha_{nk} =1.\tag{*} \] The \(A\)-complementary space of \(\mathbf x\) is the collection of sequences \(y=(y_n, n\in\mathbf N)\in \mathbf s\) for which the series \(\sum_n x_ny_n\) is \(A\)-summable for all \(x\in\mathbf x\). It is denoted by \((\mathbf x \to A)\). The authors prove Theorem 3.1. Let \(\mathbf s_0\subset \mathbf x\subset \mathbf s\) be a BK-space and suppose that \(A\) satisfies \((*)\). Then \((\mathbf x\to A)\) is also a BK-space with the norm \[ \|y\|_{(\mathbf x\to A)}:= \sup_{n}\sup_{\|x\|_{\mathbf x}\leq 1} \Biggl|\sum_{m=0}^n\alpha_{nm}x_my_n\Biggr|. \] Let \(X\) be a normed space with dual space denoted by \(X''\). A closed subset \(\Gamma \subset X''\) is called a norm-determining manifold for \(X\) if for any \(x\in X\) we have \[ \sup \{|\phi(x)|: \|\phi\|_{X''},\;\phi\in \Gamma\} = \|x\|_X. \] For example, the dual \(X''\) itself is a norm-determining manifold for \(X\). Let \(\mathbf u , \mathbf v\subset \mathbf s \). The sequence \(\lambda = (\lambda_n, n\in \mathbf N)\) is called a multiplier of the class \((\mathbf u , \mathbf v)\) if for every sequence \(x=(x_n, n\in \mathbf N)\in\mathbf u\) we have \(\lambda x=(\lambda_nx_n, n\in\mathbf N) \in \mathbf v\). In the paper the following theorem is proved: Theorem 4.1. Let the summability method \(A\) satisfy (*). Let \(\mathbf x\) and \(\mathbf y''\) be BK-spaces of sequences and suppose that the set \(\mathbf s_0\) is dense in \(\mathbf x\) and \(\mathbf s_0\subset \mathbf y\). Let \(\Gamma\) and \(\Lambda\) be norm-determining manifolds for \(\mathbf y\). Then \[ (\Gamma , (\mathbf x\to A)) = (\Lambda , (\mathbf x\to A)). \] Applying Theorem 4.1 for Walsh coefficients the authors obtain -- among others -- the following Corollary 4.2. Let the summability method \(A\) satisfy (*). Let \(\hat X\) and \(\hat Y''\) be BK-spaces of Walsh coefficients and suppose that the set \(\mathcal P\) of dyadic step functions is dense in \(X\). Let \(\Gamma\) and \(\Lambda\) be norm-determining manifolds for \(Y\). Then \[ (\Gamma , (X\to A)) = (\Lambda , (X\to A)). \]
0 references