scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1225463

MaRDI QIDQ4220137zbMATH OpenFDO

Publication date 22 November 1998

multiplier norm-determining manifolds quasi-measure summability method Walsh function

Fourier series in special orthogonal functions (Legendre polynomials, Walsh functions, etc.) (42C10) Homomorphisms and multipliers of function spaces on groups, semigroups, etc. (43A22)

Review text

The aim of the paper is to find relations between several classes of multipliers, using the notions of complementary spaces and summability factors. Let \(\mathbf x\subset \mathbf s\) be a normed sequence space. The space \(\mathbf x\) is called a BK-space, if \(\mathbf x\) is complete and the coordinatewise convergence of a sequence follows from its convergence in norm. Denote \(A = (\alpha_{nk})\) a triangular matrix summability method, satisfying \[ \sup_{n,k}|\alpha_{nk}|<\infty , \qquad \lim_n \alpha_{nk} =1.\tag{*} \] The \(A\)-complementary space of \(\mathbf x\) is the collection of sequences \(y=(y_n, n\in\mathbf N)\in \mathbf s\) for which the series \(\sum_n x_ny_n\) is \(A\)-summable for all \(x\in\mathbf x\). It is denoted by \((\mathbf x \to A)\). The authors prove Theorem 3.1. Let \(\mathbf s_0\subset \mathbf x\subset \mathbf s\) be a BK-space and suppose that \(A\) satisfies \((*)\). Then \((\mathbf x\to A)\) is also a BK-space with the norm \[ \|y\|_{(\mathbf x\to A)}:= \sup_{n}\sup_{\|x\|_{\mathbf x}\leq 1} \Biggl|\sum_{m=0}^n\alpha_{nm}x_my_n\Biggr|. \] Let \(X\) be a normed space with dual space denoted by \(X\). A closed subset \(\Gamma \subset X\) is called a norm-determining manifold for \(X\) if for any \(x\in X\) we have \[ \sup \{|\phi(x)|: \|\phi\|_{X},\;\phi\in \Gamma\} = \|x\|_X. \] For example, the dual \(X\) itself is a norm-determining manifold for \(X\). Let \(\mathbf u , \mathbf v\subset \mathbf s \). The sequence \(\lambda = (\lambda_n, n\in \mathbf N)\) is called a multiplier of the class \((\mathbf u , \mathbf v)\) if for every sequence \(x=(x_n, n\in \mathbf N)\in\mathbf u\) we have \(\lambda x=(\lambda_nx_n, n\in\mathbf N) \in \mathbf v\). In the paper the following theorem is proved: Theorem 4.1. Let the summability method \(A\) satisfy (*). Let \(\mathbf x\) and \(\mathbf y\) be BK-spaces of sequences and suppose that the set \(\mathbf s_0\) is dense in \(\mathbf x\) and \(\mathbf s_0\subset \mathbf y\). Let \(\Gamma\) and \(\Lambda\) be norm-determining manifolds for \(\mathbf y\). Then \[ (\Gamma , (\mathbf x\to A)) = (\Lambda , (\mathbf x\to A)). \] Applying Theorem 4.1 for Walsh coefficients the authors obtain -- among others -- the following Corollary 4.2. Let the summability method \(A\) satisfy (*). Let \(\hat X\) and \(\hat Y\) be BK-spaces of Walsh coefficients and suppose that the set \(\mathcal P\) of dyadic step functions is dense in \(X\). Let \(\Gamma\) and \(\Lambda\) be norm-determining manifolds for \(Y\). Then \[ (\Gamma , (X\to A)) = (\Lambda , (X\to A)). \]

Recommendations

Cited in

(6)

This page was built for publication:

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4220137)