No label defined (Q4367600)
From MaRDI portal
!
This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1092458
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | No label defined |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1092458 |
Statements
1 December 1997
0 references
special theory of relativity
0 references
gravitation
0 references
law of photochemical equivalence
0 references
motion of the perihelion of Mercury
0 references
M. Grossmann
0 references
M. Besso
0 references
G. Nordström
0 references
A. Fokker
0 references
Zürich Notebook
0 references
0.8519191145896912
0 references
0.8219817876815796
0 references
0.8181568384170532
0 references
0.8127140402793884
0 references
0.7869580388069153
0 references
This volume has been expected since long, because it contains the time preceding the publication of General Relativity. It contains 31 documents, among these 6 which had not been published previously (Nr. 1, 10, 14, 19, 22 and 30). Doc. 14 ``The Einstein-Besso Manuscript on the Motion of the Perihelion of Mercury'' (P. 360-473) is also given in a facsimile version (p. 630-682). No doubt, the most wanted part of this volume is Doc. 10 ``Research Notes on Generalized Theory of Relativity'' (p. 210-269), the so-called ``Zürich Notebook'' which is not presented in a facsimile here. The results of this Notebook have been discussed in various newspapers since long, for example in the article ``Forschungstagebuch Einsteins entschlüsselt, Erfolg in Berlin'' (Frankfurter Allgemeine 4.10.1994) where one could read: ``Die Entzifferung von Einsteins Forschertagebuch werfe ein ganz neues Licht auch auf die internen Hintergründe der Entstehungsgeschichte der Allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie:\dots vor dem Hintergrund der Ergebnisse \dots müsse die Geschichte der Allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie neu geschrieben werden''. However, what was announced as a sensation in 1994, was known to scientists since long; \textit{John Norton} had given a detailed analysis of the Zürich Notebook as early as 1984 [Historical Studies in Physical Sciences 14, part 2, 267-284 (1984)], including facsimiles of three pages.
0 references