Rasiowa-Sikorski deduction systems: A handy tool for computer science logics (Q4941933)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1418370
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Rasiowa-Sikorski deduction systems: A handy tool for computer science logics
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1418370

      Statements

      0 references
      6 December 2000
      0 references
      natural deduction
      0 references
      completeness
      0 references
      three-valued logics
      0 references
      similarity
      0 references
      nondeterminism
      0 references
      Rasiowa-Sikorski deduction systems
      0 references
      indiscernibility
      0 references
      Rasiowa-Sikorski deduction systems: A handy tool for computer science logics (English)
      0 references
      The paper provides a description of Rasiowa-Sikorski (R-S) deduction systems. The formalism of R-S deduction is a modification of the Gentzen natural-deduction system, i.e., it is in a sense dual to the well-known tableau method. Hence while in a tableau system we prove the validity of a formula \(\varphi\) by showing that \(\neg\varphi\) is not satisfiable (has a closed tableau), in an R-S system we prove directly that \(\varphi\) is (logically) valid (has a correct decomposition tree). R-S systems have proved to be a very convenient and powerful tool for developing proof mechanisms of various kinds of logics related to software specifications and knowledge representation. A notable feature of an R-S system is the fact that it is better suited to automation than a tableau method. The discussion is based on concrete examples coming from the author's experience connected with many-valued logics, nondeterminism, indiscernibility and similarity. A new result concerning a simple formalization of many-sorted first-order logic with possibly empty carriers of some sorts is given. The exposition is well structured and presented, but Theorem 1 (completeness) should be stated as follows: Any valid sequence of formulae is provable. For the entire collection see [Zbl 0921.00029].
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references