Notes on conditional logic (Q582275)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4130345
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Notes on conditional logic
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4130345

      Statements

      Notes on conditional logic (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      1989
      0 references
      In the seventies, R. Stalnaker and D. Lewis introduced semantics for counterfactuals making use of three primitive notions: possible worlds, one accessibility relation R, and for any world w a comparative possibility-relation \(<_ w\) \((w'<_ ww''\) to be read as: \(w'\) is closer to w than \(w'')\). The relation \(<_ w\) is new with respect to modal logic. In this paper conditional logic is treated as an extension of modal logic by introducing for every proposition A an accessibility relation R(A) and leaving out the relations \(<_ w.\) A model M is defined as a quadruple \(<W,{\mathfrak P},R,V>\), where 1) W is a non-empty set (of possible worlds), 2) \({\mathfrak P}\) is a set of subsets of W (called propositions), 3) \(R=\{R(S)|\) \(S\in {\mathfrak P}\}\) is a collection of (accessibility) relations over W, and 4) V assigns to every atomic formula P a subset V(P)\(\in {\mathfrak P}\). Let \(\square \to\) denote the counterfactual, M be a model and w a possible world in M. Then \(M\vDash_ wA\square \to B\) \(:=\) for all \(w'\in W\), if \(wR(\| A\|)w'\), then \(M\vDash_{w'}B\), where \(\| A\|:=\{w\in W|\) \(M\vDash_ wA\}.\) A logic L is called relational if it satisfies the following conditions: (EA) If \(A\vdash_{L}B\) and conversely, then \(A\supset C\vdash_{L}B\supset C\) and conversely, (EC) If \(B\vdash_{L}C\) and conversely, then \(A\supset B\vdash_{L}A\supset C\) and conversely, (M1) \(A\square \to (B \& C)\vdash_{L}(A\square \to B) \& (A\square \to C)\) and conversely, (M2) \(\vdash_{L}A\square \to T.\) The author constructs for any relational logic L a canonical model \(M_ L=<W_ L,{\mathfrak P}_ L,R_ L,V_ L>\), where the elements of \(W_ L\) are the maximal L-consistent sets of formulas, and proves that \(M_ L\vDash_ wA\) iff \(A\in w\). From this result there follows strong completeness for the minimal relational logic. Using the technique of filtration it is shown that several extensions of the smallest relational logic, in particular VC, have the finite model property and are decidable.
      0 references
      semantics for counterfactuals
      0 references
      modal logic
      0 references
      conditional logic
      0 references
      accessibility relation
      0 references
      possible worlds
      0 references
      relational logic
      0 references
      finite model property
      0 references
      decidable
      0 references

      Identifiers