Disturbance rejection in multivariable systems by state feedback controller. (Q5959137)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1722278
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Disturbance rejection in multivariable systems by state feedback controller.
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1722278

      Statements

      Disturbance rejection in multivariable systems by state feedback controller. (English)
      0 references
      1998
      0 references
      linear time-invariant multivariable system
      0 references
      numerical computation methods
      0 references
      pole zero assignment algorithms in multivariable systems
      0 references
      perfect disturbance rejection
      0 references
      factorization
      0 references
      designing output feedback controller
      0 references
      constant gain state feedback
      0 references
      nuclear engine
      0 references
      Consider a linear time-invariant multivariable system described by its state-space equations NEWLINE\[NEWLINE \dot x(t) = Ax(t)+Bu(t)+Ed(t), \quad y(t)=Cx(t),NEWLINE\]NEWLINE where \(x(t)\in\mathbb R^n\), \(u(t)\in\mathbb R^m\), \(y(t)\in\mathbb R^l\), \(d(t)\in\mathbb R\), and the matrices \(A\), \(B\), \(C\) and \(E\) have appropriate dimensions. In this paper, computational algorithms for designing a state feedback controller to reject the disturbances acting on linear time-invariant multivariable systems is presented. The theoretical basis for these algorithms is a factorization procedure for the transfer function matrix between the outputs and the disturbance. This enables to use the concept of a minimal order inverse to determine the position of the ``disturbance blocking zeros'' which can be assigned by state feedback to desired locations, such that all measurable or unmeasurable exponential disturbances are rejected in the steady state. The performance of the algorithms are illustrated by two numerical examples.
      0 references

      Identifiers