On the number of compatibly Frobenius split subvarieties, prime \(F\)-ideals, and log canonical centers (Q609652)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    On the number of compatibly Frobenius split subvarieties, prime \(F\)-ideals, and log canonical centers
    scientific article

      Statements

      On the number of compatibly Frobenius split subvarieties, prime \(F\)-ideals, and log canonical centers (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      1 December 2010
      0 references
      Let \(X\) be a variety over a field of prime characteristic \(p>0\) and let \(F:X\to X\) denote the (absolute) Frobenius morphism, i.e., \(F\) is the identity map on the underlying topological space and \(\mathcal{O}_X\to F_*\mathcal{O}_X\) is the Frobenius map (or the \(p\)-th power map). \(X\) is called \(F\)-\textit{split} if there is an \(\mathcal{O}_X\)-module morphism \(\theta:F_*\mathcal{O}_X\to \mathcal{O}_X\) which splits the Frobenius map \(\mathcal{O}_X\to F_*\mathcal{O}_X\). And a subvarieties \(Z\subseteq X\) is called \textit{compatibly split with \(\theta\)} if the ideal sheaf \(\mathcal{I}_Z\) satisfies \(\theta(\mathcal{I}_Z)\subseteq \mathcal{I}_Z\). The study of \(F\)-split varieties (and compatibly split subvarieties) has played an important role in algebraic geometry, representation theory and combinatorics; and it is of great interest to bound the number of compatibly split subvarieties with a given \(F\)-splitting \(\theta\). The paper under review proves a \textit{sharp} bound when \(X\) is a projective variety: Theorem 1. Suppose that \(X\) is a projective variety over an \(F\)-finite field \(k\) of characteristic \(p>0\). Further, suppose that \(\mathcal{L}\) is an ample line bundle on \(X\) with associated section ring \(S=\bigoplus_{i\geq 0}H^0(X,\mathcal{L}^i)\). Let \(n\) be the embedding dimension of \(S\) at the irrelevant ideal \(S_+\). If \(\theta:F^e_*\mathcal{O}_X\to \mathcal{O}_X\) is a splitting of the \(e\)-th iterated Frobenius map, then there are at most \(\binom{n}{d+1}\) irreducible \(d\)-dimensional subschemes of \(X\) which are compatibly split with \(\theta\). The proof of Theorem 1 is based on the following result which is interesting in its own right: Theorem 2. Let \(\mathcal{D}\) be a collection of prime ideals in an excellent local ring \((R,\mathfrak{m})\) of embedding dimension \(n\). Suppose that the set of ideals \[ \mathcal{S}=\left\{\bigcap_{P\in \mathcal{D}'}P\;|\;\mathcal{D}' \text{ is a finite subset of }\mathcal{D}\right\} \] is closed under sums. Then the number of primes \(P\in \mathcal{D}\) such that \(R/P\) has dimension \(d\) is at most \(\binom{n}{d}\). Note that Theorem 2 is not restricted to positive characteristic and hence is applicable to other situations, for example, varieties over the complex number field. Indeed, the authors demonstrate the usefulness of Theorem 2 further by establishing a \textit{sharp} bound of the number of log canonical centers using Theorem 2: Theorem 3. Let \((X,\Delta)\) be a log canonical pair and \(x\in X\) be a point with embedding dimension \(n\). Then the number of \(d\)-dimensional log canonical centers of \((X,\Delta)\) which contain \(x\) is at most \(\binom{n}{d}\).
      0 references
      Frobenius split
      0 references
      compatibly Frobenius split subvariety
      0 references
      log canonical center
      0 references
      \(F\)-ideal
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references