Almost all Delaunay triangulations have stretch factor greater than \(\pi /2\) (Q621930)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5842972
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Almost all Delaunay triangulations have stretch factor greater than \(\pi /2\)
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5842972

      Statements

      Almost all Delaunay triangulations have stretch factor greater than \(\pi /2\) (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      31 January 2011
      0 references
      The authors establish new lower bounds for the stretch factor of the Delaunay triangulation of points in the plane. Consider a Delaunay triangulation \(T\) of a set \(P\) of points in the plane as a Euclidean graph in which the weight of every edge is its length. The stretch factor of \(T\) is, among all pairs \(p,q\) of points in \(P\), the maximum ratio of the length of the shortest path from \(p\) to \(q\) in \(P\) over the Euclidean distance \(|pq|\). It has long been conjectured that the stretch factor in \(T\) of any pair \(p,p'\in P\), which is the ratio of the length of the shortest path from \(p\) to \(p'\) in \(T\) over the Euclidean distance \(\|pp'\|\), can be at most \(\pi/2\approx1.5708\). In this paper, the authors show how to construct point sets in convex position with stretch factor \(>1.5810\) and in general position with stretch factor \(>1.5846\). Furthermore, it is shown that a sufficiently large set of points drawn independently from any distribution will in the limit approach the worst-case stretch factor for that distribution. The best upper bound known for the stretch factor is \(\frac{2\pi}{3\cos(\frac\pi6)}\approx 2.419\) and was presented by \textit{J. M. Keil} and \textit{C. A. Gutwin} [Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 382, 47--56 (1989; Zbl 0766.52004)] whereas for points in convex position it is \(2.33\) [cf., \textit{S. Cui}, \textit{I. A. Kanj} and \textit{G. Xia}, Comput. Geom. 44, No. 2, 104--109 (2011; Zbl 1217.65046)].
      0 references
      0 references
      dilation
      0 references
      spanning ratio
      0 references
      shortest path
      0 references
      point configuration
      0 references
      Delaunay triangulation
      0 references
      Euclidean graph
      0 references
      Euclidean distance
      0 references
      stretch factor
      0 references
      point sets in convex position
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references