Positivstellensätze for algebras of matrices (Q649579)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Positivstellensätze for algebras of matrices
scientific article

    Statements

    Positivstellensätze for algebras of matrices (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    2 December 2011
    0 references
    Let \(\mathcal{A}\) be an algebra on which a meaningful notion of positivity exists. A `positivstellensatz' for \(\mathcal{A}\) is a theorem saying that elements in \(\mathcal{A}\) that are positive have an algebraic description turning positivity `evident'. The classical example is Artin's solution to Hilbert's 17th problem according to which a rational function on \(\mathbb{R}^n\) that is nonnegative is a sum of squares of such functions. Positivstellensätze for commutative algebras have meanwhile a rich history that is reported in the books by Bochnak, Coste, Roy; Delzell and Prestel; and Marshall. More recently, positivstellensätze for noncommutative algebras have been proved. At the beginning of this endeavour we have \textit{J. W. Helton} [Ann. Math. (2) 156, No. 2, 675--694 (2002; Zbl 1033.12001)]. In the present paper, positivstellensätze are proved for path algebras, matrices over certain noncommutative and commutative algebras, crossed product algebras, matrix polynomials in intervals, matrices over fields, and cyclic algebras. Sections 1 and 2 give much of the necessary definitions and notations fundamental for what follows: Let \(\mathcal{A}\) be a \(*\)-algebra, i.e., an algebra over \({\mathsf L}={\mathsf R}\) or \({\mathsf C}\) with involution, where \({\mathsf R}\) is a real field and \({\mathsf C}={\mathsf R}(\sqrt{-1}).\) If \((\mathcal{V},\langle \cdot,\cdot \rangle)\) is a unitary space (over \(\mathbb{C}\)), let \(\mathcal{L(V)}\) be the algebra of linear mappings of \(\mathcal{V}\) and let \(\mathcal{L}^+(\mathcal{V})\) denote the largest \(O^*\)-subalgebra; i.e., the largest subalgebra of \(\mathcal{L (V)}\) with the property that for each of its elements \(A\) there exists an adjoint \(A^*\) in it -- i.e., \(\forall v,w \in \mathcal{V}\) we have \(\langle Av,w\rangle= \langle v,A^*w\rangle.\) Recall that the standard notion of positivity on \(\mathcal{L(V)}\) is given by \(A>0\) iff \(\langle Av,v\rangle>0\) for \(v\neq 0.\) A \(*\)-representation of a \(*\)-algebra \(\mathcal{A}\) over \(\mathbb{C}\) is a homomorphism \(\pi:\mathcal{A} \rightarrow \mathcal{L^+(V)}.\) Let \(\mathcal{A}_h=\{a\in \mathcal{A}:a^*=a\}\) (with \(\mathcal{A}\) over \({\mathsf L}\)) be the self adjoint or Hermitian elements of \(\mathcal{A}\), and \(\mathcal{A}^\circ=\{x\in \mathcal{A}\setminus \{0\}: x \text{ is not zero divisor}\}.\) A set \(\mathcal{C}\subseteq \mathcal{A}_h\) is a quadratic module if it is closed under nonnegative linear combinations, contains 1, and satisfies \(x^*\mathcal{C}x\subseteq \mathcal{C}\) for all \(x\in \mathcal{A}.\) The smallest quadratic module in \(\mathcal{A},\) denoted \(\sum \mathcal{A}^2,\) is the set of sums of form \(x_1^*x_1+\cdots+x_m^*x_m\) with \(x_i\in \mathcal{A}.\) A quadratic module \(\mathcal{C}\) defines a noncommutative preordering if the product of any two commuting elements in \(\mathcal{C}\) belongs to \(\mathcal{C}.\) Denote the smallest noncommutative preordering by \(\sum_{ nc} \mathcal{A}^2.\) Given \(a\in \mathcal{A},\) a set \(\mathcal{S}_a \subseteq \mathcal{A}_h\) containing \(a,\) so that for all \(x\in \mathcal{A},\) \(x^*\mathcal{S}_a x \subseteq \mathcal{S}_a;\) and \(bc=cb,~ b\in \mathcal{S}_a,~ c\in \sum_{nc} \mathcal{A}^2\) together imply \(bc\in \mathcal{S}_a\) is a denominator set for \(a.\) Finally, given a \(*\)-algebra \(\mathcal{A}\) over \({\mathsf L}\) with \(*\)-subalgebra \(\mathcal{B},\) certain linear and involution-preserving surjections \(p:\mathcal{A} \rightarrow \mathcal{B}\) so that \(p(\sum \mathcal{A}^2) \subseteq \sum \mathcal{B}^2\) are called strong conditional expectations. With these definitions and a notion of positivity on \(\mathcal{A},\) let \(\mathcal{A}_+\) be the positive elements in \(\mathcal{A}.\) A positivstellensatz of type I, II, III, IV, V is satisfied by \(x\in \mathcal{A}_+\) according to the following: type I: if \(x\in \sum \mathcal{A}^2;\) type II: if there exists a \(c\in \mathcal{A}^\circ\) so that \(c^*xc \in \sum \mathcal{A}^2;\) type III: if there is a \(c\in \mathcal{A}^\circ \cap \sum \mathcal{A}^2\) so that \(xc=cx\) and \(xc \in \sum \mathcal{A}^2;\) type IV: if \(x\in \sum_{nc} \mathcal{A}^2;\) type V: if there is \(c_x\in \mathcal{S}_x\) so that \(\sum_{nc} \mathcal{A}^2.\) Algebra \(\mathcal{A}\) is said to satisfy a positivstellensatz of type X if all its positive elements satisfy the respective positivstellensatz. Section 3 recalls the notion of the path algebra \(\mathbb{C} \Gamma\), defined in a natural way from a directed multigraph \(\Gamma\) that contains with each arrow \(b\) also its reverse \(b^*.\) Let \(\mathcal{F}=\mathbb{C}\langle a_1,\dots,a_m,a_1^*,\dots,a_m^* \rangle\) be the free \(*\)-algebra over \(\mathbb{C}\) on \(m\) generators. In Proposition 3.1, the authors generalize the main theorem of Helton [loc. cit.]: a Hermitian element in the matrix algebra \(M_n(\mathcal{F})\) satisfies \(\rho(X)\geq 0\) for every finite dimensional representation \(\rho,\) if and only if \(X\in \sum M_n(\mathcal{F})^2.\) They then define a strong conditional expectation from \(M_n(\mathcal{F})\) onto \(\mathbb{C} \Gamma\) to prove a similar type I positivstellensatz for the path algebra in a manner different from \textit{S. Popovych} [J. Algebra 324, No. 9, 2418--2431 (2010; Zbl 1219.46068)]: a Hermitian \(X\) in \(\mathbb{C} \Gamma\) allows only nonnegative images under finite dimensional \(*\)-representations if and only if \(X=\sum_{j=0}^k X_j^* X_j\) for some \(X_j\in \mathbb{C}\Gamma.\) Section 4 proves an Artin theorem for matrices over noncommutative zero divisor free unital \(*\)-algebras that satisfy the left Ore condition: given \(a\in \mathcal{A}, s\in \mathcal{A}^\circ=\mathcal{A}\setminus\{0\},\) there exist \(b\in \mathcal{A}, t\in \mathcal{A}^\circ\) so that \(ta=bs.\) First diagonalizability results for Hermitian matrices over \(\mathcal{A}\) are shown. Next suppose \(\mathcal{A}\) to be an \(O^*\)-algebra on a unitary space. Then natural definitions of positivity yield \(\mathcal{A}_+\) and \(M_n(\mathcal{A})_+.\) Theorem 4.8 shows that a type II positivstellensatz holds for the matrix algebra \(M_n(\mathcal{A})\) provided it holds for \(\mathcal{A}\) itself. In Section 5 for a unital \(*\)-algebra \(\mathcal{A},\) and a finite group \(G\) of \(*\)-automorphisms of \(\mathcal{A},\) the crossed product \(\mathcal{A} \times_\alpha G\) is defined -- see \textit{R. S. Pierce} [Associative algebras. New York-Heidelberg-Berlin: Springer (1982; Zbl 0497.16001)]. One then has the regular covariant representation \(\pi_{creg}:\mathcal{A} \times_\alpha G \rightarrow \mathcal{L}(\oplus_{g\in G} \mathcal{V})\) which defines in analogy to earlier observations a notion of positivity via \((\mathcal{A} \times_\alpha G)_+=\{x\in \mathcal{A} \times_\alpha G: \pi_{creg}(x) \geq 0\}.\) Then if a positivstellensatz of type I or type III holds for \(M_n(\mathcal{A})\) then - again via a strong conditional expectation -- the respective theorem will hold for \(\mathcal{A} \times_\alpha G.\) Also if \(\mathcal{A}\) is an \(O^*\)-algebra without zero divisors and \(\mathcal{A}^\circ\) is left Ore, we have: if a type II satz holds for \(\mathcal{A}\) then it holds for \(\mathcal{A} \times_\alpha G.\) Section 6 assumes \(\mathcal{A}\) to be a finitely generated unital and commutative \(*\)-algebra without zero divisors over \(\mathbb{R}\) or \(\mathbb{C}.\) By \(\hat{\mathcal{A}}\) the set of characters is understood and it is assumed that \(\sum_j a_j^*a_j=0\) implies \(a_1=a_2= \cdots=a_n=0.\) This can be guaranteed if \(\hat{\mathcal{A}}\) separates points. Positivity notions are given by \(\mathcal{A}_+ =\{a\in \mathcal{A}: \chi(a)\geq 0 \text{ for } \chi \in \hat{\mathcal{A}}\}\) and \(M_n(\mathcal{A})_+=\{A: (\chi(a_{ij}))\geq 0 \text{ for }\chi \in \hat{\mathcal{A}}\}.\) Then a type II positivstellensatz holds for \(M_n(\mathcal{A}).\) The proof uses induction on \(n\) and diagonalization. Section 7 recalls a matrix version of the classical Fejér-Riesz theorem due to \textit{M. Rosenblum} [J. Math. Anal. Appl. 23, 139--147 (1968; Zbl 0159.43102)] and defines a conditional expectation to show the following interesting result. Theorem 7.3: Let \(F(x) \in M_n(\mathbb{C}[x])\) be a self adjoint matrix polynomial. Then \(F(x)\) is positive semidefinite in every point \(x\in [a,b]\) if and only if \(F=G_1^*G_1+(b-x)(x-a)G_2^*G_2\) for some \(G_1,G_2 \in M_n(\mathbb{C}[x]).\) Similar results are shown for half open intervals. Section 8 is concerned with positivstellensätze for \(M_n({\mathsf L})\) with \({\mathsf L}\) as in section 2. If \(B=\text{diag}(1,\lambda_1,\dots, \lambda_{n-1})\) with \(\lambda_i\in \mathbb{R}^\circ\), then for \(X\in M_n({\mathsf L})\) one defines \(X^\tau = B^{-1} X^* B.\) This yields an involution which is associated to the inner product \(\langle x,y \rangle_1 :=\langle Bx,y \rangle,\) where the right hand side uses the standard inner product. Write \(P_B({\mathsf L})\) for the preordering generated by the \(\lambda_i.\) An ordering \(p\) of \({\mathsf R}\) that contains \(\lambda_1, \dots, \lambda_{n-1}\) is a \(*\)-ordering. The positivity is defined by \((M_n({\mathsf L}), \tau)_+\) being the set of matrices \(X\) for which \(X=X^\tau\) and all the principal minors of \(X\) belonging to \(P_B({\mathsf L}).\) It is shown that a type IV positivstellensatz holds for \((M_n({\mathsf L}),\tau).\) \textit{I. Klep} and \textit{T. Unger} have shown that a type I satz cannot hold for \(n\geq 3;\) see [J. Algebra 324, No. 2, 256--268 (2010; Zbl 1262.16039)]. Section 9 uses results and notation of the previous section to show positivstellensätze for cyclic algebras. Let \({\mathsf L}\) be as before. Let \( {\mathsf L/K} \) be a Galois extension with group \(\mathbb{Z}/(n),\) and \(\mathfrak{A}\) be the cyclic algebra associated to \({\mathsf L/K} \) (see Pierce [loc. cit., Ch. XV]). Positivity is defined by \(\mathfrak{A}_+\) being the set of elements \(y=y^*\) for which \(\mathfrak{p}(x^*yx)\in P_B({\mathsf L} )\) for all \(x\in \mathfrak{A},\) where \(\mathfrak{p}:\mathfrak{A} \rightarrow {\mathsf L} \) is a certain canonical projection. A type IV positivstellensatz holds for \(\mathfrak{A}.\) Section 10 illustrates the results of the previous sections having in common that \(\mathcal{A}_+=\{x\in \mathcal{A}_h: \pi(x) \geq 0 \text{ for all finite dimensional }*\)-representations
    0 references
    matrices over ring
    0 references
    conditional expectation
    0 references
    Positivstellensätze
    0 references
    sums of squares
    0 references
    noncommutative associative algebras
    0 references
    algebras with involutions
    0 references
    Ore condition
    0 references
    diagonalization
    0 references
    quivers
    0 references
    path algebra
    0 references
    cyclic algebra
    0 references
    enveloping algebra of Lie algebra
    0 references
    path algebras
    0 references
    crossed product algebras
    0 references
    matrix polynomials
    0 references
    preordering
    0 references
    Lie algebras
    0 references
    Weyl algebras
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references