Bounding embedded singularities of Hilbert schemes of points on affine three space (Q6545241)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7854828
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Bounding embedded singularities of Hilbert schemes of points on affine three space
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7854828

      Statements

      Bounding embedded singularities of Hilbert schemes of points on affine three space (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      29 May 2024
      0 references
      The author bounds how bad singularities of the Hilbert scheme \(\mathrm{Hilb}^n \mathbb C^3\) of \(n\) points on \(\mathbb C^3\) can be in the following sense. By work of \textit{B. Szendrői} [Geom. Topol. 12, No. 2, 1171--1202 (2008; Zbl 1143.14034)] and \textit{K. Behrend} et al. [Invent. Math. 192, No. 1, 111--160 (2013; Zbl 1267.14008)] on Donald-Thomas invariants, \(\mathrm{Hilb}^n \mathbb C^3\) can be realized as the critical locus \(d \tilde f = 0\) for a regular function \(\tilde f: \mathcal X \to \mathbb C\) with \(\mathcal X\) a smooth quasi-projective variety of dimension \(2n^2+n\). Therefore one can view \(\mathrm{Hilb}^n \mathbb C^3 \cong \mathcal Y \subset \mathcal X\) as a closed subscheme. The \textit{multiplicity} of a point \(\eta \in Y\) is defined by \(\mathrm{mult}_{\eta} \mathcal Y = \max\{q > 0 : I_{\mathcal Y,\eta} \subset \mathfrak m_{\mathcal X, \eta}^q\}\). Following the technique of \textit{M. Mustaţă} [J. Am. Math. Soc. 15, No. 3, 599--615 (2002; Zbl 0998.14009)], the author estimates the log canonical threshold \(\mathrm{lct}_{\eta} (\mathcal X, \mathcal Y)\) for arbitrary \(\eta \in \mathcal Y\) using jet schemes, then combines with the inequalities\N\[\N\frac{1}{\mathrm{mult}_{\eta} \mathcal Y} \leq \mathrm{lct}_{\eta} (\mathcal X, \mathcal Y) \leq \frac{\dim \mathcal X}{\mathrm{mult}_{\eta} \mathcal Y}\N\]\Nto bound \(q_n = \max\{\mathrm{mult}_{\eta} \mathcal Y, \eta \in \mathcal Y\}\) and concludes that \(q_n\) has at most linear growth in \(n\). In particular, the Hilbert schemes \(\mathrm{Hilb}^n \mathbb C^3\) do not have arbitrarily bad singularities in the sense of \textit{R. Vakil} [Invent. Math. 164, No. 3, 569--590 (2006; Zbl 1095.14006)]. By contrast, \textit{J. Jelisiejew} has shown that \(\mathrm{Hilb}^n \mathbb C^{16}\) does have arbitrarily bad singularies up to retraction [Invent. Math. 220, No. 2, 581--610 (2020; Zbl 1473.14007)]. The proof uses the Atiyah-Drinfeld-Hitchin-Manin description relating irreducible components of \(\mathrm{Hilb}^n \mathbb C^d\) with those of the scheme \(C_{d,n}\) parametrizing \(d\) commuting \(n \times n\) matrices (see \textit{A. A. Henni} and \textit{M. Jardim} [Adv. Geom. 18, No. 4, 467--482 (2018; Zbl 1403.14015)] and \textit{J. Jelisiejew} and \textit{K. Šivic} [J. Reine Angew. Math. 788, 129--187 (2022; Zbl 1494.14007)]).
      0 references
      0 references
      Hilbert schemes of points
      0 references
      singularities
      0 references
      jet schemes
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references