Terminal Fano threefolds and their smoothings (Q658344)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Terminal Fano threefolds and their smoothings
scientific article

    Statements

    Terminal Fano threefolds and their smoothings (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    12 January 2012
    0 references
    Let \(X\) be a (almost) Fano threefold with \textit{terminal} Gorenstein singularities (\(-K_X\) is always at least nef and big). Then, due to \textit{T. Minagawa} [Osaka J. Math. 38, No. 3, 533--540 (2001; Zbl 1073.14540)] and \textit{Y. Namikawa} [J. Algebr. Geom. 6, No. 2, 307--324 (1997; Zbl 0906.14019)], there exists a \textit{smoothing} of \(X\), i.e., a flat projective morphism \(\pi: \mathcal{X} \to \Delta\), where \(\mathcal{X}\) is a reduced complex space, \(\Delta\ni 0\) is a unit disk, \(\mathcal{X}_0 := \pi^{-1}(0) = X\), and \(\mathcal{X}_t := \pi^{-1}(t)\) is smooth ((almost) Fano) for all \(t\neq 0\). The main result of the paper under review (see Theorem 1.4 in the text) asserts that \(\text{Pic}(\mathcal{X})\simeq\text{Pic}(\mathcal{X}_t)\) for all \(t\). Let us sketch the authors' argument. Firstly, one may notice (Proposition 1.1) that \(\mathcal{X}\) is normal, with at most isolated terminal factorial singularities. This, together with Kawamata--Viehweg vanishing Theorem and Leray spectral sequence gives \(\text{Pic}(X) \simeq H^2(X, \mathbb{Z}) \simeq \text{Pic}(\mathcal{X}) \simeq H^2(\mathcal{X}, \mathbb{Z})\) (note also that the inclusion \(X \hookrightarrow \mathcal{X}\) is a deformation retract). So it suffices to show the natural restriction map \(r: H^2(\mathcal{X}, \mathbb{Z}) \to H^2(\mathcal{X}_t, \mathbb{Z})\), \(t \neq 0\), is an isomorphism. Note that the injectivity of \(r\) is obvious. Further, after a base change one may assume the monodromy of \(\pi\) to be trivial. In particular, if \(L_t\) is a line bundle on \(\mathcal{X}_t\), we may suppose \(L_t\) is defined on \(\mathcal{X}^* := \mathcal{X}\setminus{X}\). One thus has to extend \(L_t\) to \(\mathcal{X}\). Let \(\mathcal{Y}\) be a log resolution of \((\mathcal{X}, X)\) and \(\mathcal{W}\) a semistable reduction of \(\mathcal{Y}\). Then the pullback of \(L_t\) to \(\mathcal{W}^*\) is the restriction of a class \(L_{\mathcal{W}} \in H^2(\mathcal{W}, \mathbb{Q})\) (by the \textit{Local Invariant Cycle Theorem}). Now, as the rational map \(\mathcal{W} \dashrightarrow \mathcal{X}\) is Galois over \(\mathcal{X}_{\text{reg}}\), the Galois trace of \(L_{\mathcal{W}}\) determines a class \(\xi \in H^2(\mathcal{X}_{\text{reg}}, \mathbb{Q})\). The latter extends \(L_t\) to \(\mathcal{X}_{\text{reg}}\). Furthermore, since \(\mathcal{X}_{\text{reg}}\) is Cohen-Macaulay, we have \(H^2(\mathcal{X}_{\text{reg}}, \mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}_{\text{reg}}}) = 0\), which together with the exponential exact sequence shows that a multiple of \(\xi\) comes from a line bundle on \(\mathcal{X}_{\text{reg}}\). But \(\mathcal{X}\) is normal and factorial. So a multiple of \(\xi\) induces a line bundle on \(\mathcal{X}\). Now it is easy to see that \(L_t\) also extends to \(\mathcal{X}\). In Section 3, the authors consider examples of Fano threefolds with \textit{canonical} Gorenstein singularities. They construct non-smoothable such Fano (\(\mathbb{P}(3,1,1,1)\) in Example 3.1), one for which the Picard number jumps in the smoothing (\(\mathbb{P}^1 \times \mathbb{P}(1,1,2)\) in Example 3.2), and also a Fano with non-unique smoothing (cone in \(\mathbb{P}^7\) over del Pezzo surface of degree \(6\) in Example 3.3).
    0 references
    Fano threefold
    0 references
    smoothing
    0 references
    Picard number
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references