On the set of values of a positive ternary quadratic form (Q6633322)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7939204
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    On the set of values of a positive ternary quadratic form
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7939204

      Statements

      On the set of values of a positive ternary quadratic form (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      5 November 2024
      0 references
      Let \(A\in \mathrm{Mat}(n\times n,\mathbb{Z})\) be a symmetric positive definite matrix of integers, where \(n\geq 2\) and let \(\Lambda:=\{(Ax,x),x\in\mathbb{Z}^n\}\) be the set of values of its quadratic form on integral vectors. This set can be enumerated in the increasing order:\N\[\N0=\lambda_0<\lambda_1<\lambda_2<\dots\N\]\NThis work is interested in the question as to whether the distances between neighbouring elements of \(\Lambda\) are bounded, i.e., is it true that\N\[\N\sup\{\lambda_{k+1}-\lambda_{k}:k=0,1,\dots\}<+\infty\text{ or that }\sup\{\lambda_{k+1}-\lambda_{k}:k=0,1,\dots\}=+\infty ?\N\]\NObviously that for \(n=2\) these distances are not bounded. On the other hand, it is known that for \(n\geq 4\), the set \(\Lambda\) contains an infinite arithmetic progression. In this work, shown that for also \(n=3\), the set \(\Lambda\) contains an infinite arithmetic progression. Therefore, \(\sup\{\lambda_{k+1}-\lambda_{k}:k=0,1,2,\dots\}<+\infty\) if \(n\geq 3\).
      0 references
      0 references
      ternary quadratic form
      0 references
      value distribution
      0 references

      Identifiers