Proof of a conjecture of Segre and Bartocci on monomial hyperovals in projective planes (Q690674)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Proof of a conjecture of Segre and Bartocci on monomial hyperovals in projective planes
    scientific article

      Statements

      Proof of a conjecture of Segre and Bartocci on monomial hyperovals in projective planes (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      28 November 2012
      0 references
      Let \(q\) be an even prime power, and let \(\mathrm{PG}(2,q)\) be the Desarguesian projective plane of order \(q\). A set of points in \(\mathrm{PG}(2,q)\) of largest possible size such that no three are collinear has cardinality \(q+2\), and is called a hyperoval. Given a hyperoval \(D\) in \(\mathrm{PG}(2,q)\), one can choose a system of homogeneous coordinates so that \(D\) has the form \[ D(f(x)):=\{(1,x,f(x)) \mid x \in \mathbb{F}_q\} \cup \{(0,0,1), (0,1,0)\} \] where \(f(x)\) is a polynomial with certain properties. This paper is concerned with the case where \(f(x)\) is a monomial, i.e. \(f(x)=x^k\) for some positive integer \(k\). Segre has shown that if \(k=2^i\) or \(k=6\), then there are an infinite number of values of \(q\) such that the set \(D(x^k)\) is a monomial. The main result of this paper asserts that, for all other values of \(k\), \(D(x^k)\) is a hyperoval for at most a finite number of values of \(q\). This result had been conjectured by \textit{B. Segre} and \textit{U. Bartocci} [Acta Arith. 18, 423--449 (1971; Zbl 0219.50016)]. The proof of the main result is simplified by the following fact: \(D(x^k)\) is a hyperoval in \(\mathrm{PG}(2,q)\) if and only if the polynomial \(1+x+\dots + x^{k-1}\) is a permutation polynomial on \(\mathbb{F}_q\). This equivalence yields the main result for \(k\) odd; in addition the case when \({k\equiv2\pmod 4}\) was proved by Segre and Bartocci [loc. cit.]. Thus the bulk of this paper is concerned with the remaining case, \({k\equiv 0 \pmod 4}\). The proof relies on particular properties of a class of polynomials \(g_k(x,y,z)\) which is defined in the text, as well as Bezout's theorem on the intersection of algebraic curves.
      0 references
      0 references
      oval
      0 references
      hyperoval
      0 references
      absolutely irreducible
      0 references
      monomial hyperoval
      0 references
      Bezout
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references