Ergodicity of mapping class group actions on representation varieties. I: Closed surfaces (Q699682)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Ergodicity of mapping class group actions on representation varieties. I: Closed surfaces
    scientific article

      Statements

      Ergodicity of mapping class group actions on representation varieties. I: Closed surfaces (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      25 September 2002
      0 references
      Let \(\Sigma\) be a closed oriented surface with fixed basepoint and \({\Gamma_\Sigma}\) its mapping class group. Let \(K\) be a compact Lie group and \({\Hom(\pi_1\Sigma,K)}\) the \(\mathbb R\)-algebraic set of representations of \(\pi_1\Sigma\) into \(K\) . Then \({\Gamma_\Sigma}\) acts on \({\Hom(\pi_1\Sigma,K)}\), preserving the Lebesgue measure class of the open subset of smooth points. The quotient \(H^1(\Sigma,K)\) of \({\Hom(\pi_1\Sigma,K)}\) by conjugation has a \({\Gamma_\Sigma}\)-invariant symplectic structure, and hence an invariant smooth measure. The main result of this paper is that \({\Gamma_\Sigma}\) acts ergodically on \({\Hom(\pi_1\Sigma,K)}\) and on \(H^1(\Sigma,K)\). When the simple factors of \(K\) are \(\text{SU}(2)\), this result follows from work of the reviewer [Ann. Math. (2) 146, 475-507 (1997; Zbl 0907.57009)]. The proof involves a sewing procedure for surfaces-with-boundary. The authors introduce a somewhat nonstandard boundary condition for bounded surfaces: namely, the group element boundary condition is a choice of generator of \(\pi_1(b_i)\) for each boundary component \(b_i\subset \partial \Sigma\) and an element \(k_i\in K\). Introducing such boundary conditions gives a natural decomposition of the space \({\Hom(\pi_1\Sigma,K)}\) of representations as a product over \(K\) of the components of \(\Sigma\) split along a separating simple closed curve. In this way the main theorems can be proved inductively. The first stage of the induction is the 1-holed torus. Here the space of representations with group element boundary condition consists simply of pairs \((g_\alpha,g_\beta)\in K\times K\) with commutator \([g_\alpha,g_\beta] = k\). Using harmonic analysis to decompose \(L^2(K\times K)\) the authors prove ergodicity of the action of \({\Gamma_\Sigma}\) by embedding the generators (induced by Dehn twists on \(\Sigma\)) in a connected group \(A\), so that \({\Gamma_\Sigma}\)-invariant functions are \(A\)-invariant. Transitivity is easier to prove for \(A\), since it can be reduced to questions about the Lie algebra of \(K\). After dealing with the case of the 2-holed torus, the sewing lemma is used to prove the general case with group element boundary condition. Several facts about the topology of the commutator map \([,]:K\times K\rightarrow K\) are used, and their proofs are discussed in two appendices.
      0 references
      fundamental group of surface
      0 references
      compact Lie group
      0 references
      moduli space
      0 references
      mapping class group
      0 references
      ergodic theory
      0 references

      Identifiers