Ramanujan's ``lost'' notebook. IX: The partial theta function as an entire function (Q702706)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2128866
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Ramanujan's ``lost'' notebook. IX: The partial theta function as an entire function
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2128866

      Statements

      Ramanujan's ``lost'' notebook. IX: The partial theta function as an entire function (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      17 January 2005
      0 references
      In Ramanujan's ``lost'' notebook, it is claimed that \[ \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a^nq^{n^2} = \prod_{n=1}^{\infty} \left(1 + aq^{2n-1}(1 + y_1(n) + y_2(n) + \cdots) \right), \] where \[ \begin{aligned} y_1(n) &= \frac{\sum_{j \geq n} (-1)^jq^{j^2+j}}{\sum_{j \geq 0} (-1)^j(2j+1)q^{j^2+j}}\\ \text{and} y_2(n) &= \frac{\left(\sum_{j \geq n} (j+1)(-1)^jq^{j^2+j}\right) \left(\sum_{j \geq n} (-1)^jq^{j^2+j} \right) } {\left(\sum_{j\geq 0} (-1)^j(2j+1)q^{j^2+j} \right)^2}. \end{aligned} \] This is reminiscent of the identity treated Part VIII: The entire Rogers-Ramanujan function [Adv. Math. 191, No. 2, 393--407 (2005; Zbl 1067.11062)]. Indeed, Andrews uses more or less the same method to prove the above assertion. One notable difference is that the key polynomials were orthogonal in that paper but are not orthogonal in the present case.
      0 references
      partial theta functions
      0 references
      entire functions
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references