Bounded derived categories of very simple manifolds (Q763653)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Bounded derived categories of very simple manifolds
scientific article

    Statements

    Bounded derived categories of very simple manifolds (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    29 March 2012
    0 references
    The bounded derived category \(D^{b}(\text{Coh}(X))\) of the abelian category \(\text{Coh}(X)\) of coherent sheaves on a smooth, proper algebraic variety is a \(\mathbb{C}\)-linear Ext-finite triangulated category which is saturated, as shown by \textit{A. Bondal} and \textit{M. van den Bergh} in [Mosc. Math. J. 3, No. 1, 1--36 (2003; Zbl 1135.18302)]. Saturatedness means that any cohomological functor \(H:D^{b}(\text{Coh}(X))\to (\text{Vect-}\mathbb{C})\) of finite type is representable, i. e. there is \(a\in \text{Ob}(D^{b}(\text{Coh}(X))\) such that \(H(-)\simeq \text{Hom}_{D^{b}(\text{Coh}(X))}(-,a)\) as functors. If \(X\) is a smooth, compact complex surface having no complete curve, then Bondal and van den Bergh prove that \(D^{b}(\text{Coh}(X))\) is not saturated. In the present paper, the author generalizes this result to the case of a very simple manifold \(X\), i. e. a compact, connected complex manifold of \(\dim_{\mathbb{C}}(X)\geq 2\) and having no complete irreducible subvariety other than \(X\) and points. If \(X\) is a very simple manifold, the author shows that \(D^{b}(\text{Coh}(X))\) is not saturated by presenting an explicit non-representable cohomological functor of finite type. The proof goes as follows: first, the author defines a torsion pair \((\mathcal{T},\mathcal{F})\) of \(\text{Coh}(X)\) by letting \(\mathcal{T}\) be the full subcategory of \(\text{Coh}(X)\) of torsion sheaves, and \(\mathcal{F}\) the full subcategory of \(\text{Coh}(X)\) of coherent torsion free sheaves. This torsion pair is used to define a \(t\)-structure on \(D^{b}(\text{Coh}(X))\), whose heart is an abelian category \(^{p}\mathcal{C}\). The main technical results is that \(^{p}\mathcal{C}\) is of finite length, i. e. it is a noetherian and artinian abelian category (this is a special case of a more general result of \textit{S. Meinhardt} contained in [Int. J. Math. 23, No. 5, 1250035, 17 p. (2012; Zbl 1240.14008)]). We have then a set \(\{c_{\lambda}\}_{\lambda\in\Lambda}\) of complete representatives of isomorphism classes of simple objects of \(^{p}\mathcal{C}\). If \(^{p}\widehat{\mathcal{C}}\) is the category of left exact functors from \(^{p}\mathcal{C}^{op}\) to \((\text{Vect-}\mathbb{C})\), we have a natural fully faithful, exact, covariant functor \(\iota: ^{p}\mathcal{C}\to ^{p}\widehat{\mathcal{C}}\) sending \(x\) to \(\text{Hom}_{^{p}\mathcal{C}}(\cdot,x)\), inducing a functor \(\widetilde{\iota}:D^{b}(^{p}\mathcal{C})=D^{b}(\text{Coh}(X))\to D^{b}(^{p}\widehat{\mathcal{C}})\). As \(^{p}\widehat{\mathcal{C}}\) is locally noetherian, for every object of \(^{p}\widehat{\mathcal{C}}\) one has an injective hull inside \(^{p}\widehat{\mathcal{C}}\). Letting \(\widehat{c}_{\lambda}\) be an injective hull of \(\iota(c_{\lambda})\), one defines \(e:=\bigoplus_{\lambda\in\Lambda}\widehat{c}_{\lambda}\), which is an injective object of \(^{p}\widehat{\mathcal{C}}\). The author shows that the functor \(E(-):=\text{Hom}_{D^{b}(\text{Coh}(X))}(\widetilde{\iota}(-),e)\) is a non-representable cohomological functor of finite type. The idea of the proof is that if \(E\) was representable, then there would be an object \(a\in D^{b}(\text{Coh}(X))\) such that \(E(-)\simeq \text{Hom}_{D^{b}(\text{Coh}(X))}(-,a)\): using the fact that \(e\) is injective, the author shows that \(a\) can be chosen to be an object of \(^{p}\mathcal{C}\). There are then \(f\in\mathcal{F}\) and \(t\in\mathcal{T}\) and an exact sequence in \(^{p}\mathcal{C}\) of the form \(0\to f\to a\to t[-1]\to 0\). If \(x\) is not in the support of \(t\) nor a singular point of \(f\), then \(\mathbb{C}_{x}[-1]\) is a simple object of \(^{p}\mathcal{C}\). By definition of \(e\) one should have \(E(\mathbb{C}_{x}[-1])=\mathbb{C}\), but the authors shows that \(E(\mathbb{C}_{x}[-1])=0\) by standard cohomological computations, getting a contradiction.
    0 references
    0 references
    derived category
    0 references
    cohomological functor
    0 references
    very simple manifold
    0 references

    Identifiers