Representing subalgebras as retracts of finite subdirect powers (Q783295)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Representing subalgebras as retracts of finite subdirect powers
    scientific article

      Statements

      Representing subalgebras as retracts of finite subdirect powers (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      12 August 2020
      0 references
      For a class \(\mathcal{K}\) of algebras with the same function symbols, \(H \mathcal{K}\) denotes the class of all homomorphic images of algebras in \(\mathcal{K}\), \(S \mathcal{K}\) the class of subalgebras, and \(P_{\text{fs}}\) the class of finite subdirect products of members of \(\mathcal{K}\). \textit{P. M. Neumann} [Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 2, 91 (1970; Zbl 0215.10304)] proved that for a finite nilpotent group \(\mathbf{A}\), we have \(S \{\mathbf{A}\} \subseteq H P_{\text{fs}} \{\mathbf{A} \}\). The present paper generalizes this result from finite groups to arbitrary algebras. For a general universal algebra, the concept of nilpotency considered here is \textit{supernilpotency with respect to the \(2\)-term higher commutator} (for short, \textit{\(2\)-term-supernilpotency}). A group satisfies this condition if and only if it is nilpotent. The authors prove that for every \(2\)-term-supernilpotent algebra \(\mathbf{A}\), we have \(S \{ \mathbf{A} \} \subseteq H P_{\text{fs}} \{ \mathbf{A} \}\); in fact the homomorphic images can even be taken to be retracts. Hence, if \(\mathcal{K}\) is a class of \(2\)-term-supernilpotent algebras with \(H P_{\text{fs}} \mathcal{K} \subseteq \mathcal{K}\), then \(S \mathcal{K} \subseteq \mathcal{K}\). As another corollary, the authors obtain that for a finite algebra \(\mathbf{A}\) in a variety \(\mathcal{V}\) all of whose members are \(2\)-term-supernilpotent, we have \[ HSP_{\text{fin}} \{\mathbf{A}\} \subseteq H P_{\text{fs}} \{ \mathbf{A} \}. \] A second thread of results concerns what are called \textit{axiomatic formations} of algebras: Suppose that \(\mathcal{K}\) is such that every algebra in \(\mathcal{F} := H P_{\text{fs}} \mathcal{K}\) is \(2\)-term-supernilpotent and \(\mathcal{F}\) can be defined by a set of first-order formulae. Then \(\mathcal{F}\) is a variety. Finally, the authors exhibit a six element nilpotent expanded group with \(S \{\mathbf{A}\} \not\subseteq H P_{\text{fs}} \{\mathbf{A} \}\). An outstanding feature is that the main result makes no assumption on the algebra, such as generating a congruence modular variety or satisfying a Mal'cev condition, other than the algebra being \(2\)-term-supernilpotent.
      0 references
      formation
      0 references
      higher commutator
      0 references
      nilpotent
      0 references
      pseudovariety
      0 references
      retract
      0 references
      subalgebra
      0 references
      subdirect power
      0 references
      supernilpotent
      0 references
      two term condition
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references