Cardinality questions concerning semilattices of finite breadth (Q789418)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3845643
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Cardinality questions concerning semilattices of finite breadth
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3845643

      Statements

      Cardinality questions concerning semilattices of finite breadth (English)
      0 references
      1984
      0 references
      Let A be a set and \({\mathcal F}(A)\) the finite subsets of A ordered by inclusion. R. Haydon has raised the question: Does there exist a cofinal family \({\mathcal F}_ 0\) (i.e. every G in \({\mathcal F}(A)\) is a subset of some F in \({\mathcal F}_ 0)\) which is closed under finite intersection and is such that for every F in \({\mathcal F}_ 0\) the collection of proper subsets of F which are in \({\mathcal F}_ 0\) has at most two maximal members? In this paper the author reformulates this question about \({\mathcal F}(A)\) in the setting of lattices, and provides a rather interesting answer. The author shows that if L is a lattice in which every element has only finitely many predecessors and not more than k immediate predecessors, for some positive integer k, then L has cardinality \(| L| \leq \aleph_{k-1}\). There are still other questions that remain open. For example, for the lattices mentioned above is \(| L| \leq \aleph_{k-1}\) possible for \(k>2\), or do we always have \(| L| \leq \aleph_ 1?\)
      0 references
      k-lattice
      0 references
      irredundant sequence
      0 references
      breadth
      0 references
      cofinal family
      0 references
      maximal members
      0 references
      predecessors
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers