Comment on ``Helmholtz theorem and the \(v\)-gauge in the problem of superluminal and instantaneous signals in classical electrodynamics,'' by A. Chubykalo et al. (Q867010)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Comment on ``Helmholtz theorem and the v-gauge in the problem of superluminal and instantaneous signals in classical electrodynamics, by A. Chubykalo et al. |
scientific article
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | Comment on ``Helmholtz theorem and the \(v\)-gauge in the problem of superluminal and instantaneous signals in classical electrodynamics,'' by A. Chubykalo et al. |
scientific article |
Statements
Comment on ``Helmholtz theorem and the \(v\)-gauge in the problem of superluminal and instantaneous signals in classical electrodynamics,'' by A. Chubykalo et al. (English)
0 references
14 February 2007
0 references
The paper comments on recent claims on instantaneous propagation of the irrotational component of the full electromagnetic field as a physical observable in electromagnetic wave theory [\textit{A. Chubykalo, A. Espinoza, R. A. Flores, A. G. Rodriguez}, Found. Phys. Lett. 19, 37--49 (2006; Zbl 1117.78001)]. Using the full electromagnetic potentials, it is shown that this claim cannot be supported. Besides the development of the theory, using the Helmholtz-theorem and a Greens-function approach, specific examples show that the fields are always retarded, as it is common text book knowledge.
0 references
electromagnetic waves
0 references
potentials
0 references
retarded propagation
0 references
0 references
0.9747666
0 references
0.9474868
0 references
0.82737875
0 references
0.8265552
0 references
0.79888755
0 references
0.79331464
0 references
0.7904792
0 references
0.7898675
0 references
0.7891043
0 references
0.78873163
0 references