Pointwise approximation by algebraic polynomials (Q914087)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Pointwise approximation by algebraic polynomials
scientific article

    Statements

    Pointwise approximation by algebraic polynomials (English)
    0 references
    1989
    0 references
    The following result is due to \textit{A. F. Timan} [Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 78, 17-20 (1951; Zbl 0042.071)]. For all \(f\in C^ r[-1,1]\), \(r\in {\mathbb{N}}_ 0\) there exists a polynomial \(P_ n\) of degree not greater than n, such that for any \(x\in [-1,1]\) (1) \(| f(x)-P_ n(x)| \leq C\Delta_ n(x)^ r\omega_ 1(f^{(r)},\Delta_ n(x)),\) where \(\Delta_ n(x)=(\sqrt{1-x^ 2}/n)+1/n^ 2\) and \(\omega_ 1(f^{(r)},.)\) is the modulus of continuity of the rth derivative of f. \textit{Yu. A. Brudnyi} [Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 161, 746-749 (1965; Zbl 0132.049)] managed to replace \(\omega_ 1\) in (1) by s-th modulus of continuity \(\omega_ s\), while \textit{I. E. Gopengauz} [Teor. Funkcii, Funkcional'. Analiz. Prilozen. 4, 204-210 (1967; Zbl 0185.136)] proved the estimate simultaneously for derivatives of f: \[ (2)\quad | f^{(k)}(x)-P_ n^{(k)}(x)| \leq C\Delta_ n^{r-k}\omega_ s(f^{(r)},\Delta_ n(x)). \] In 1963, G. G. Lorentz raised the question of whether \(\Delta_ n(x)\) in (1) can be replaced by \(\Gamma_ n(x)=\sqrt{1-x^ 2}/n\). This problem was solved in 1966 by S. A. Telyakowskij. In 1967-1985 \textit{I. E. Gopengauz} [Mat. Zametki 1, 163-172 (1967; Zbl 0165.387)] (case \(s=1)\), \textit{R. De Vore} [Proc. Conf. Approximation of Functions, Kalouga 132-141 (1975)] \((s=1\), \(r=0)\) and \textit{H. Gonska} and \textit{E. Hinnemann} [Approximation Theory IV, Proc. int. Conf., Tex A \& M Univ. 1983, 527-532 (1983; Zbl 0551.41028)] \((s\leq r+2\), \(k=0\) and \(s\leq r\), \(0\leq k\leq r-s)\) proved that in some cases \(\Delta_ n(x)\) can be replaced by \(\Gamma_ n(x)\) in (2) as well. In 1985 \textit{Xiangming Yu} [J. Approximation Theory Appl. 1, No.3, 109-114 (1985; Zbl 0637.41006)] gave a counterexample (for the case \(s=r+3)\) to show that in general it's not possible. The paper establishes that for \(\Delta_ n(x)\) in (2) can be replaced by \(\Gamma_ n(x)\) it's necessary and sufficient that \(0\leq k\leq \min \{r-s+z,r\}\), which solves the problem completely.
    0 references
    0 references
    modulus of continuity
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references