\((L^p(\mathbb R_+,X),L^q(\mathbb R_+,X))\)-admissibility and exponential dichotomies of cocycles (Q984432)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
\((L^p(\mathbb R_+,X),L^q(\mathbb R_+,X))\)-admissibility and exponential dichotomies of cocycles
scientific article

    Statements

    \((L^p(\mathbb R_+,X),L^q(\mathbb R_+,X))\)-admissibility and exponential dichotomies of cocycles (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    19 July 2010
    0 references
    The author analyzes the existence of exponential, no past exponential and ordinary dichotomies of an exponentially bounded, strongly continuous cocycle \(\{\Phi(\theta,z)\}_{\theta\in\Theta,t\in\mathbb{R}_+}\) over a continuous semiflow \(\sigma\), where a notion of no past exponential dichotomy is introduced by the author which denotes a weakening of the exponential dichotomy with respect to the existence of the solutions in backward time. The main tool is the \((L^p (\mathbb{R}_+,X),L^q (\mathbb{R}_+,X))\)-admissibility condition. This condition implies that the output is bounded above by the input. Requiring the boundedness to be uniform with respect to \(\theta\), the author proves that the admissibility condition ensures no past exponential dichotomy for the cocycle. Some variants for ordinary dichotomy as well as complete characterizations for exponential dichotomy are obtained.
    0 references
    exponential dichotomy
    0 references
    strongly continuous cocycle
    0 references
    admissibility
    0 references
    skew-product semiflow
    0 references
    exponentially bounded semiflow
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references