LAD estimation with random coefficient autocorrelated errors.
From MaRDI portal
We compare the performance of LAD and OLS in linear regression models with errors which are randomly autocorrelated. This model yields thick-tailed error distributions which make profitable to estimate the model by LAD. The LAD estimator for randomly autocorrelated errors is proved to be asymptotically normal. Monte Carlo results show that LAD improves upon OLS, unless we revert to a constant autocorrelation model, where the two methods are comparable.
Recommendations
- Estimating the variance of the LAD regression coefficients.
- Randomly weighted LAD-estimation for partially linear errors-in-variables models
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4182656
- Estimation in Random Coefficient Autoregressive Models
- Parameter estimation in a regression model with random coefficient autoregressive errors
Cites work
- Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation
- Conditional Heteroscedastic Time Series Models
- Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Returns: A New Approach
- Glejser's test revisited
- Least absolute error estimation in the presence of serial correlation
- LM TESTS IN THE PRESENCE OF NON-NORMAL ERROR DISTRIBUTIONS
- Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation and inference in dynamic models with time-varying covariances
- Regression Quantiles
- Trimmed Least Squares Estimation in the Linear Model
Cited in
(2)
This page was built for publication: LAD estimation with random coefficient autocorrelated errors.
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5941338)