Large subsets of Euclidean space avoiding infinite arithmetic progressions
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: It is known that if a subset of has positive Lebesgue measure, then it contains arbitrarily long finite arithmetic progressions. We prove that this result does not extend to infinite arithmetic progressions in the following sense: for each in , we construct a subset of that intersects every interval of unit length in a set of measure at least , but that does not contain any infinite arithmetic progression.
Recommendations
- Maximal subsets free of arithmetic progressions in arbitrary sets
- Dimensions of sets which uniformly avoid arithmetic progressions
- Finite and infinite arithmetic progressions in sumsets
- Three-term arithmetic progressions in subsets of \(\mathbf{F}_q^\infty\) of large Fourier dimension
- Thick subsets that do not contain arithmetic progressions
Cites work
- Construction of one-dimensional subsets of the reals not containing similar copies of given patterns
- Full dimensional sets without given patterns
- Large sets avoiding linear patterns
- Large sets avoiding patterns
- Large Sets Avoiding Rough Patterns
- On sets of integers containing k elements in arithmetic progression
- On Sets of Integers Which Contain No Three Terms in Arithmetical Progression
- Salem sets with no arithmetic progressions
- Sequences not Containing an Infinite Arithmetic Progression
- Sets of large dimension not containing polynomial configurations
- The Erdős similarity problem: a survey
Cited in
(5)
This page was built for publication: Large subsets of Euclidean space avoiding infinite arithmetic progressions
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6039983)