Matrix Young numerical radius inequalities
Let \(T\) be a bounded linear operator on a Hilbert space \(\mathcal{H}\). Then the numerical radius of \(T\) is defined by NEWLINE\[NEWLINE\omega (T) = \sup \{|\langle Tf, f \rangle | : f \in \mathcal{H}, \|f\| = 1\}.NEWLINE\]NEWLINE The main result of the paper states that for \(p > q > 1\) such that \(\frac{1}{p} + \frac{1}{q} = 1\), and for \(A \in M_n(\mathbb{C})\), a non scalar strictly positive matrix such that \(1 \in \sigma(A)\), there exists \(X \in M_n(\mathbb{C})\) such that NEWLINE\[NEWLINE\omega(AXA) > \omega (\frac{1}{p} A^p X + \frac{1}{q} X A^q).NEWLINE\]NEWLINEThe proof uses the Schur product and the Schur complement techniques of matrices. The authors also explore some general inequalities concerning the numerical radius for matrices.
- New estimations for the Berezin number inequality
- Some generalized numerical radius inequalities for Hilbert space operators
- An arithmetic-geometric mean inequality related to numerical radius of matrices
- On operator inequalities involving numerical radius and operator norm
- Matrix form of the inverse Young inequalities
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7806569 (Why is no real title available?)
- Interpolating numerical radius inequalities for matrices
- Inner product inequalities with applications
- Complementary bounds for the numerical and spectral radii
This page was built for publication: Matrix Young numerical radius inequalities
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2853311)
